Fuel Economy & Emissions Talk about the mileage database, EPA, hypermiling, gas and driving strategy.

Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Old Jan 28, 2007 | 07:56 AM
  #71  
Kraken's Avatar
Active Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 141
From: Carless in Curacao, Netherland Antilles
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by Earthling
I see that attitude as a major problem with people's choice of vehicles.

We had three children, and got by just fine with a Taurus station wagon that got 31 miles per gallon highway.

There is no reason on earth that a family with three children can't get by just fine with a fuel-efficient car, i.e. a station wagon.

The real problem is that people give fuel economy such a low priority that they don't even bother putting forth the effort to find a vehicle that meets their needs and provides good fuel economy. Those vehicles are out there, you just have to put in the effort to discover them!

Harry
Harry, I couldn't agree with you more! The Taurus station wagon was a wonderfully practical vehicle, especially for packing the clan around. Where are these practical vehicles today? Where are the station wagons? They're still here. They are called SUVs and minivans (sad, but true).
 

Last edited by Kraken; Jan 28, 2007 at 08:02 AM.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #72  
GeekGal's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 874
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by TJandHybrids
Then lean towards a Highlander Hybrid. Same as the Escape, but the engine stays off when you are at a light...and has more time 'in stealth mode' (no ICE), then the Ford Escape Hybrid. My brother has one, and tells me that his A/C, when it's on, forces the ICE to always run; not the same with the Highlander.

Unless they (Ford) have changed that...
Uh, no. Here's what your brother meant --

The FEH's ICE goes off/stays off at lights/stops/low speeds with the A/C on... the only times it does not is if you are using MAX. A/C (marked red on the climate control dials) or defrost (same); if the vehicle's catalytic convertor isn't yet up to temp (right at startup from a cold start overnight, etc.); or the battery's SOC (State of Charge) is sufficiently low enough to tell the system to use the ICE to charge the battery.

I'm not familiar enough with the HiHy to say if its capable of running its A/C compressor on EV-only, but if that is the case that would be the only distinction between the two vehicle's "stealth capabilities".

I would also posit that it's easier to keep/put a FEH into EV-only mode, if only because it is a smaller, lighter vehicle with a smaller engine. The HiHy has more mass and weight to haul around (loaded or not), and I haven't read any factual data to support that it is somehow engineered to prefer EV-only mode compared to the FEH system.

Buy the vehicle that works for you, but do so with the right factual data going in... there are absolutely valid reasons for someone to prefer a HiHy over a FEH, but let's make it based on facts and needs, not mistakes.
 

Last edited by GeekGal; Jan 28, 2007 at 10:33 AM. Reason: clarification
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #73  
pmagnavox's Avatar
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
From: Cincinatti
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by msantos
Wow...

According to you:

Point 1 - The nation owes a great debt to the truck phenomenon in North America. The other 4 Billion people around the world do not build good housing because somehow they do not exhibit the same wasteful comsumerism as we do along with the appreciation these vehicles deserve.

Are you sure we need trucks to have the same creature conforts as cars? Most farmers and building contractors around my parts often complain that since automakers started adding extreme creature conforts to appeal to the urban driver, the base prices on these types of vehicles have risen to the point that they can no longer afford them as well, and when they do, they worry that they no longer can get into the vehicle with their dirty clothes as they once did without "damaging" it.

Also, "some" would take issue with your view that somehow trucks played an indispensable and significant role in post Katrina events (If I recall, the helicoper did). How? Well, let me explain: Are you sure that the insatiable and wasteful appetite for trucks was not an exarcebating contributor to the event? Even in the slightest of ways?

Point #2 - ...

... wait a minute... I SHOULD know better!

I'm likely feeding a tr*ll.
Hold on a minute...I feel you misunderstood my post.

Under Point #1, I meant to place the gratitude to those that drive trucks for what they have contributed to the nation. The majority of "hard industry" emplyes those that use and drive trucks everyday. This "hard industry" includes Construction, Toolmakers, Die Makers, Mold Makers etc. If not for them, we wouldnt have a fraction of what we use daily. As for post Katrina events, those that have been re-building the destroyed areas are also those that drive trucks on a daily basis. These people migrated south for the work, to be able to afford the luxeries that most people take for granted.

To answer you question of these trucks causing Katrina...I think that is a great stretch.

And to call me a Troll?? Please show me where I have called you a name or bashed any of your thoughts.
 
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #74  
pmagnavox's Avatar
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
From: Cincinatti
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by AshenGrey
Earthling makes a good point:

Back when I was a roofer, you could buy a plain-old WORK TRUCK. It didn't has an all-leather interior. It didn't have a 6-speed automatic or a 6-CD changer. It didn't have power windows, power mirrors, or a power robot hand to wipe your rear-end for you.

The WORK TRUCKS of olde usually had a v6, not a mutant/gigantic v8 or v10. It had cloth or vinyl seats. It had a sturdy 5-speed manual transmission. It lasted for close to 200k miles. You could get a WORK TRUCK for under $20k. And their gas mileage wasn't terrible.

That's my gripe: I'd like to own a truck, but I don't want a bloated monstrosity. It would be nice to have the ability to buy an i4 or v6 utility truck for moving a couch or hauling supplies from Home Depot.

A truck the size of a Chevy S10 or a 1990s-era Ford Ranger, equipped with FAS, would pretty much be the perfect homeowner/utility truck. You'd have the ability to haul things, have acceptable gas mileage, and be able to run power tools -- in a sub-$25k package.

And I am pretty sure your average Harry Homeowner could do just fine with a truck the size (and price) of a Chevy S10.
Just to let you know, the work truck of old, the 6 cylinder truck you are mentioning, didn't fare well on MPG's My Dad's truck had the 300ci inline 6 and only got 10 mpg.

You can still get a great work truck for under $20k, but you'd have to take last years left over models. They would have creature comforts and still be able to perform nicely.
 
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #75  
gumby's Avatar
Energy Independence
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,282
From: Richardson, TX
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by pmagnavox
Just to let you know, the work truck of old, the 6 cylinder truck you are mentioning, didn't fare well on MPG's My Dad's truck had the 300ci inline 6 and only got 10 mpg.
That sounds like a pretty big inline 6 (Dodge, Ford, Nissan?). But if it got only 10 MPG, it was either in too-heavy a truck, or was geared for stump-pulling - not regular transportation.
MY dad had several Chevy inline 6 trucks over the years (50s, 60s, and 70s). The 1953 full-size had a 216ci. We replaced that engine with a 235ci inline 6, when restoring it in the mid 70s. With a 3-speed column shift manual, it got around 20 MPG putzing around town. I learned how to drive with THIS truck!
I don't remember the engine-size or the MPG on the 1960s truck (I was too young).
The 1971 full-size Chevy truck was a 250ci, 3-speed column shift manual tranny too. It got 18 MPG, with a camper shell on the back.
Technology HAS improved since the 70s. So a full-size truck (not to mention a mini-truck) should be able to get over 18 MPG (35 years later), easily.

P.S. to whoever made the Leather longevity comment... Wouldn't vinyl be more long-wearing even than Leather? Bad things happen to leather (and its stitching) when it gets wet. Ask me how I know
 
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #76  
pmagnavox's Avatar
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
From: Cincinatti
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by gumby
That sounds like a pretty big inline 6 (Dodge, Ford, Nissan?). But if it got only 10 MPG, it was either in too-heavy a truck, or was geared for stump-pulling - not regular transportation.
MY dad had several Chevy inline 6 trucks over the years (50s, 60s, and 70s). The 1953 full-size had a 216ci. We replaced that engine with a 235ci inline 6, when restoring it in the mid 70s. With a 3-speed column shift manual, it got around 20 MPG putzing around town. I learned how to drive with THIS truck!
I don't remember the engine-size or the MPG on the 1960s truck (I was too young).
The 1971 full-size Chevy truck was a 250ci, 3-speed column shift manual tranny too. It got 18 MPG, with a camper shell on the back.
Technology HAS improved since the 70s. So a full-size truck (not to mention a mini-truck) should be able to get over 18 MPG (35 years later), easily.

P.S. to whoever made the Leather longevity comment... Wouldn't vinyl be more long-wearing even than Leather? Bad things happen to leather (and its stitching) when it gets wet. Ask me how I know
It was a Ford F-250 4X4 with the 300 straight 6 carburated. It achieved the 10 MPG full, empty, towing, with camper, without camper, it didn't matter. Transmission was a 3speed with granny gear.

Ok, you piqued my interest...How do you know about leather stitching when it gets wet?? LOL
 
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #77  
Delta Flyer's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,155
From: Lewisville (Dallas), Texas
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

I'm speaking rhetorically and in general.

Originally Posted by pmagnavox
...And to call me a Troll?? Please show me where I have called you (msantos) a name or bashed any of your thoughts.
That's not the only way to attack a forum...lot's of things can be done to disrupt the normal activities of a board...this is GreenHybrid - intutively it's a place to promote hybrids and green/eco issues. Of course there is occasonal skepticism, but it's much more often than that for over a week now.

In real life, white supreamists don't attend a NAACP convention - police assist if necessary to protect African-Americans freedom to associate from those that wish to abuse free speech. There are many people who think such harassment of associations on the internet is unlimited and protected free speech{sigh} It's a fallacy to do on the net what you should not do in person.

msanto's concern is an unusally high number of people over the last week challenging hybrids and fuel efficiency - core forum values. It seems like they work in shifts. Thursday afternoon, one person got evicted four times, declaring he would always return. His last avitar was a burning offshore oil rig.

Sorry if some of us are a bit parnaoid, but it definitely seems like this hybrid sanctuary has had a hunting season declared on it. As in real life, the civilized and reasonable thing to do is to live and let live with those you differ with - not infiltrate.
 

Last edited by Delta Flyer; Jan 28, 2007 at 06:27 PM.
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #78  
pmagnavox's Avatar
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
From: Cincinatti
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by Delta Flyer
I'm speaking rhetorically and in general.



That's not the only way to attack a forum...lot's of things can be done to disrupt the normal activities of a board...this is GreenHybrid - intutively it's a place to promote hybrids and green/eco issues. Of course there is occasonal skepticism, but it's much more often than that for over a week now.

In real life, white supreamists don't attend a NAACP convention - police assist if necessary to protect African-Americans freedom to associate from those that wish to abuse free speech. There are many people who think such harassment of associations on the internet is unlimited and protected free speech{sigh} It's a fallacy to do on the net what you should not do in person.

msanto's concern is an unusally high number of people over the last week challenging hybrids and fuel efficiency - core forum values. It seems like they work in shifts. Thursday afternoon, one person got evicted four times, declaring he would always return. His last avitar was a burning offshore oil rig.

Sorry if some of us are a bit parnaoid, but it definitely seems like this hybrid sanctuary has had a hunting season declared on it. As in real life, the civilized and reasonable thing to do is to live and let live with those you differ with - not infiltrate.
Ok, break it down in laymens terms...why attack me?? Are you calling me a White Supremasist??

And what does this have to do with the Freedom of Speech? Has there been a law broken lately?
 
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #79  
AshenGrey's Avatar
Hybrid True Believer
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 881
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by worthywads
Toyota does make a I4 Tacoma but it's pretty rare, I got mine for $18K, so the vehicle you want is available. 28+mpg so far.

The V6 Tacoma will put you in Monster Truck status though.
The i4 Tacoma sounds like a good truck for me!
 
Old Jan 28, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #80  
gumby's Avatar
Energy Independence
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,282
From: Richardson, TX
Default Re: Monster-truck driver sees the light...

Originally Posted by pmagnavox
It was a Ford F-250 4X4 with the 300 straight 6 carburated. It achieved the 10 MPG full, empty, towing, with camper, without camper, it didn't matter. Transmission was a 3speed with granny gear.

Ok, you piqued my interest...How do you know about leather stitching when it gets wet?? LOL
F250 4x4 is a truck definitely meant to be off-road more than on, and is NOT built with fuel economy in mind. MANY F150 2-wheel-drive pickups will do better than 10 MPG, city or highway.

Wet leather - left the top down on the Benz (twice) during a workday, while it raned on it some before I could get to it and put the top back on. The drivers' side seat stitching frayed and broke, just after those incidents. Coincidence - I think not. The water weakens the stitching. Now the leather on the Benz is SO treated (it's not even soft) that it did not suffer much damage, other than stripping where the stitches go. It's just enough that I'll have to replace the whole leather seating rather than being able to repair it.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us -

  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47 PM.