With compromises, crossovers and SUVs are attractive substitutes


By Andy Mikonis
updated 12:54 p.m. CT, Tues., Nov. 6, 2007

Minivans can’t shake their frumpy image. Sales have declined nearly 32 percent over the past five years, with an especially precipitous drop (22 percent) through Sept. compared to the same period last year, according to CNW Marketing Research. Ford and General Motors have abandoned the minivan altogether. Like most manufacturers — even the ones that still sell minivans — they’re focusing instead on a fast-growing new segment called crossover utility vehicles, which blend elements from cars, SUVs, and minivans.

Although there’s still nothing as practical for hauling people and cargo as a minivan, with some compromises, crossovers and traditional SUVs can be attractive alternatives.

. . .
Minivans are built on car-based, front-wheel drive platforms, which not only create a much smoother ride, but also allow for pushing the axles to the ends of the vehicle to create a low, flat floor and maximize interior space.

By contrast, the beefy frames on truck-based SUVs limit interior space and layout. That’s why the gargantuan GMC Yukon Denali XL on our list of Ten Minivan Alternatives is 20 inches longer on the outside than the Chrysler Town & Country minivan, yet has 7 cubic feet less cargo capacity behind the front seats.
. . .