Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-03-2005, 07:10 PM
9G-Man's Avatar
Active Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 57
Default Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

I really like the nav option, but it does change the shape and natural flowing contour of the std. dash. What do you think?
 

Last edited by Jason; 12-04-2005 at 12:20 AM.
  #2  
Old 12-03-2005, 07:38 PM
ElanC's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: El Cerrito, CA
Posts: 700
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

I wish you had taken both photos from the same angle at the same distance.
The way you photographed the Nav model is unflatering. The lower vantage point
makes the instrument openings in front of the driver, which are the same in both
models, look like big black gaping holes on the Navi model.
 
  #3  
Old 12-03-2005, 07:40 PM
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 2,161
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

A little. The nav makes the car look a little more industrial with its sharper lines. I'd still get nav though.
 
  #4  
Old 12-03-2005, 07:52 PM
tigerhonaker's Avatar
G.H. Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Music City, Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Thumbs up Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

Well you did ask for (Opinions) right? Most definitely the HCH ll with the
Nav. , it reminds me of the Acura Line of vehicles and they are
most assuredly "High-Tech" looking in looks and performance. Go Nav.

Always Nav.

Terry
 
  #5  
Old 12-04-2005, 07:27 AM
AZMerf's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 550
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

No comparison. Go with the Nav.
 
  #6  
Old 12-04-2005, 03:27 PM
moosh's Avatar
Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 97
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

Nav is pointless. Especially in a hybrid where you should be monitoring your driving habits, to max out your FE.
 
  #7  
Old 12-04-2005, 03:46 PM
AZMerf's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 550
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

Originally Posted by moosh
Nav is pointless. Especially in a hybrid where you should be monitoring your driving habits, to max out your FE.
I use it to find the most efficent route or when there is traffic I can use it to go around. I wouldn't say it's pointless. It might be expensive but not pointless.
 
  #8  
Old 12-04-2005, 04:29 PM
tigerhonaker's Avatar
G.H. Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Music City, Tennessee
Posts: 1,396
Post Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

Originally Posted by AZMerf
I use it to find the most efficent route or when there is traffic I can use it to go around. I wouldn't say it's pointless. It might be expensive but not pointless.
Well said; I was going to post exactly what you just pointed out
and then I thought, whats the point.

I agree with you and you get what you pay for.

Terry
 
  #9  
Old 12-04-2005, 07:00 PM
moosh's Avatar
Owner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 97
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

Originally Posted by AZMerf
It might be expensive but not pointless.
That's what I meant. Not pointless, but not worth the money.
 
  #10  
Old 12-04-2005, 09:21 PM
Reynolds's Avatar
Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 60
Default Re: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison

As someone who currently has the Honda/Alpine Navi in an Accord, I will say that I will not be getting the Navi in the Civic Hybrid, should I finalize the purchase.

The system is useful for finding one's way home, to a new destination, etc.

The voice recognition is good for safety, for those times where you can't / don't want to take your eyes off the road.

However, I don't use the actual Navigation very much - most of my driving is in my local metro area.

What I do use it for is:
- To switch settings on the HVAC (and I hate having to do this)
- To practice my FE techniques with the Trip Computer (and the Civic's Navi does NOT have this applet)
- To see the artist / title when something interesting is on XM.
- To show off when I have a new passenger in the car (big whoop)

Given that I can do an outboard XM, an aftermarket Navi, and the Civic's auto climate control isn't solely controlled through the touchscreen, I think I'll pass this time around.

It's a very good system. I just don't use it to its full benefit, and without the Trip Computer, it's not much more than a toy for me, as another poster stated in a different thread. Were the TC to be there, however, I'd give it more serious consideration.

Back on-topic - Call me crazy, but I actually like the plastic panels better on the Navi-equipped car, vs the non-Navi car. I don't like the touchscreen's location, or its control layout in this version, nor its motorized flip gimmick every time I want to change CDs, mind you. Just the lines / flow of the plastic surround in the dash, given the two pics above. Note how there are more 'seams' in the top dash of the non-Navi car.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
twolostminds
Ford Escape Hybrid
23
01-22-2009 03:22 PM
leepark
Toyota Camry Hybrid
5
10-25-2006 05:36 AM
neisserj1
Toyota Camry Hybrid
1
10-01-2006 05:58 AM
hamm3r
Toyota Camry Hybrid
8
07-14-2006 08:12 AM
jamng
Toyota Camry Hybrid
5
06-01-2006 06:10 PM



Quick Reply: Nav vs Non-Nav Panel comparison


Contact Us -

  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 AM.