I felt a little twinge of guilt today!

Old Jul 8, 2004 | 11:02 PM
  #11  
flare's Avatar
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 321
Default

LOL kenny, that's a good idea!
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 07:03 PM
  #12  
kenny's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,120
From: So. California
Default

Today I modified the sheet that I post outside my office, and got a lot of attention.
I showed 2 columns of my Excel file: the date, and my morning MPG.
At the bottom of the MPG column I put the Average ( 61.4 MPG) in bold letters.
Then I made a graph for the techies.

Then I made a huge headline that read, "61.4 MPG".
you can read the headline from down the hall.
I colored the 61.4 with a yellow highlighter.

I also added a few notes about the conditions:
Cruise control at 53 MPH, raised tire pressure
And this is the real show stopper, "You NEVER plug in a hybrid; hitting the brakes or decelerating charges the battery.

About 20 people stopped to talk today.
I feel like a JW ringing doorbells.
It is amazing that nobody knows you do not plug hybrids in.
The companys are NOT getting the word out.
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #13  
xcel's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,567
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Hi All:

___When I got out of the Insight this morning at work, an electrician in a BMW 325i said it must be nice to get 50 to 60 mpg in it at today’s prices. When I said I have been receiving between 100 and 110 mpg over the last 2 months, he said, holy #$%#!

___Tonight on the way home (4.5 hours to drive 95 miles w/ a 36 mile stop and go monster traffic jam ), I was speaking with some folks in a Minivan to the side of me. We were talking about fuel economy and how I liked the car. When I told them I was at 98.9 mpg before the traffic jam at the 18 mile point and was at 87.9 mpg after another ~ 20 miles of this nightmare, they couldn’t believe it. I offered and at the next 4 car distance move and stop, one of the passengers jumped out to take a look at my gauge cluster. The expression I saw simply had to be seen

___I did finish up at 95.1 mpg which is great for the monster traffic nightmare I traversed but sucks as this tank is screwed and I only have 1 commute on it so far (99.8 mpg over 196.3 miles on Trip A) compared to the last few tanks I have had

___On the other side of the coin, there is an HCH 5-speed driver at work that is only receiving in the low 40’s in his. I mentioned this site for tips and tricks but apparently, he doesn’t care?

___Good Luck

___Wayne R. Gerdes
___Hunt Club Farms Landscaping Ltd.
___Waynegerdes@earthlink.net
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 10:14 PM
  #14  
sirlan's Avatar
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 43
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

I always have to look for the release when I stop for gas. My co-workers still can't believe my mileage even though it isn't as good as what it could be. I think I'm averaging about 4-5 weeks between fill-ups for about 550-600 miles per tank. Unfortunately, my commute is almost all stop and go traffic for only 7 miles each way. I'm lucky when I get above 40 MPH and that doesn't seem to be optimal for good mileage. I have to fight to keep it above 45 MPG. It definitely does better on longer trips.
 
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #15  
texashchman's Avatar
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 387
From: League City, Texas
Default

Originally posted by sirlan@Jul 10th 2004 @ 12:14 AM
my commute is almost all stop and go traffic for only 7 miles each way. I'm lucky when I get above 40 MPH and that doesn't seem to be optimal for good mileage. I have to fight to keep it above 45 MPG. It definitely does better on longer trips.
I guess I'm lucky as one of my ways to work I can go almost 50 miles none stop. It really does make a difference. I hate it when I take it to go shopping. Kevin
 
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #16  
xcel's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,567
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Hi Johanerlandsson:

___There isn’t even close to enough ethanol or Biodiesel to power even a small percentage of today’s SI and Diesel ICE’s but CO2 wise, it is a zero sum vs. fossil fuels at 19 + pounds per gallon of petrol. It does have a positive energy balance (well to wheel so to speak) unlike H2 whether it is burned directly or via FCV in a PEM based Fuel Cell.

___As for future nukes used to produce H2, yes; I know all about that

___Good Luck

___Wayne R. Gerdes
___Hunt Club Farms Landscaping Ltd.
___Waynegerdes@earthlink.net
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gerardnc
Lexus RX 400h
22
Jun 1, 2006 05:43 PM
Jason
Fuel Economy & Emissions
3
Jul 1, 2005 10:12 AM
lakedude
Honda Civic Hybrid
6
Nov 10, 2004 06:07 PM
Stevo12886
Off Topic
1
Feb 4, 2004 11:58 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us -

  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:39 AM.