Fuel Economy & Emissions Talk about the mileage database, EPA, hypermiling, gas and driving strategy.

Adjustment to my cars data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 12:34 PM
  #1  
ericbecky's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Contributor ($)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,382
From: Madison, WI
Default

FYI.

Today I went back and edited the tankful posts for my Insight to reflect the calculated mpg as opposed to dash mpg. For reference, I have identified the dash mpg in the comments of each tank.

I have noticed a +2.5% difference between the dash and my calculated mpg.

I have decided to go with the (lower) calculated mpg so people do not think the numbers are "inflated".
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #2  
Jason's Avatar
Site Founder
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,623
Default

It's one of my plans to have an input for "calc" or "auto" figures so that it's easier on everyone.
 
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
xcel's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,567
From: Northern Illinois
Default

Hi Ericbecky:

___With your actuals, make sure you post in the notes section distances and gallons purchased. It will add even more credibility …

___It is too bad that people are quoting their LCD’s mileage instead of their actuals all over the net, not just here. There are quite a few Edmund’s posters posting the same (Prius owners in particular) right off the LCD instead of the actuals which is a real disservice to future Hybrid owners imho.

PS: I saw you last tank about half an hour ago. Slow down just a tad (well more then a tad but you know what I mean ) and you should be ok for a year round average > the EPA combined. Remember, the EPA isn’t doing 65 mph or running the A/C when they run their City/Highway tests.

___Good Luck

___Wayne R. Gerdes
___Hunt Club Farms Landscaping Ltd.
___Waynegerdes@earthlink.net
 
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 01:29 AM
  #4  
ericbecky's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Contributor ($)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,382
From: Madison, WI
Default

My wife joined me on that last trip, so the constant a/c and additional speed were unavoidable.

But this new tank I'm working on is going much better. 74.4mpg for the first 175 miles.

Plus, I actually reach my first 90.0 mpg, 30 mile segment on my way home from work yesterday. That should help.
 
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 10:32 AM
  #5  
texashchman's Avatar
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 387
From: League City, Texas
Default

I have said many times that the numbers need to be from the tank and not the dash. I have had it right on the same numbers only twice to being off on the bad side as much as 10% :o . I have never been to the good side either, but most of the time it's been around 2 to 3 % off. Kevin
 
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #6  
BIF's Avatar
BIF
Active Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 85
From: Central Florida
Default

I can vouch for that. My latest tank was 49.5 on the computer, but 46.1 by way of calculator.

Because there were no major temperature changes, there would probably be zero chance of "bladder effect" messing up my numbers. Therefore, I figure that the calculated average is probably more trustworthy than the computer, and that's what I always use when inputting my numbers into the database.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rmorrow
Toyota Camry Hybrid
6
Sep 6, 2007 11:10 AM
nitramjr
Ford Escape Hybrid
3
Sep 18, 2006 09:38 PM
Eskimonio
Toyota Camry Hybrid
5
Aug 18, 2006 11:04 PM
Donald
HCH II-Specific Discussions
3
Jul 14, 2006 10:21 PM
dalemccl
Toyota Prius
1
Apr 3, 2006 04:45 AM



Contact Us -

  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:08 AM.