87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
#11
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
The engine is tuned and designed to run on 87 octane! Octane is a NUMBER or rating that is used to express the resistance to uncontrolled pre-ignition, generally a slower combustion. If the engine is designed for a faster combustion (lower octane) then you will actually lose mpg by running a higher octane rating. (before you flame me this is for a layman's understanding of octane)
#13
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
What year? How many miles? How long have you had it?
Bob Wilson
#14
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
The bottom line is pretty simple....
Use what the manufacturer recommends. They are telling you what the engine was designed to run on. Using anything else will likely have a negative effect on both your performance and fuel economy.
(I'm sure someone somewhere will post that in THEIR car THEY got better performance using a different fuel rating than recommended. In reality, your car will run best on what is recommended unless there is a problem with your vehicle...in which case the right action is to get it fixed not change fuel rating.)
Use what the manufacturer recommends. They are telling you what the engine was designed to run on. Using anything else will likely have a negative effect on both your performance and fuel economy.
(I'm sure someone somewhere will post that in THEIR car THEY got better performance using a different fuel rating than recommended. In reality, your car will run best on what is recommended unless there is a problem with your vehicle...in which case the right action is to get it fixed not change fuel rating.)
#15
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
Octane is "anti-knock"... and the lower compression due to the atkinson cycle makes knocking almost impossible with even the lowest octane.
( I heard Poland sells 80 Octane, and Russia... 78 Octane... I'd like to try it some time... but it's pretty far for me to get some! ) -John
Numbers below from 85 Octane... 4,000 pound SUV too!
#16
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
Are you sure about lower compression in an atkinson cycle? I could have sworn it had a higher compression than average.
I believe the Prius has:
Toyota Prius hybrid electric (front-wheel drive) with a compression ratio of 13.0:1
That's pretty high.
I believe the Prius has:
Toyota Prius hybrid electric (front-wheel drive) with a compression ratio of 13.0:1
That's pretty high.
#17
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
That's the "theoretical" compression ratio that you'd get if the closing of the intake valve wasn't delayed. But it is significantly delayed (by 32 degrees in the Camry Hybrid's 2.4-L ICE versus the non-hybrid's 2.4-L ICE). It's the expansion ratio that's represented by this number; the effective compression ratio is around 10:1, as in all low-octane ICEs. Calling it a "compression ratio" is what's throwing you off. The big expansion ratio is what gets more of the thermal energy out of the gases before they're discharged (hence the higher thermodynamic efficiency) — but it also breathes in less fuel per stroke, and so results in the lower power of the "Atkinson"-type ICE for its rated size. It's really more like a 2-L than a 2.4-L ICE power-wise.
You can see the comparison of these two engines on page EG-3 of the attached file from the 2007 Camry Hybrid "New Car Features Guide."
Stan
You can see the comparison of these two engines on page EG-3 of the attached file from the 2007 Camry Hybrid "New Car Features Guide."
Stan
#18
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
Hmmm... cool. Can you explain the formula on how to take theoretical compression ratio and convert it to the "actual". I understand the delay, is it because the valve is open that the volume of the chamber is actually bigger therefore the compression ratio is smaller? So when cylinder is at TDC there is a valve (exhaust) that is still open?
Last edited by livvie; 01-29-2008 at 10:18 AM.
#19
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
Hmmm... cool. Can you explain the formula on how to take theoretical compression ratio and convert it to the "actual". I understand the delay, is it because the valve is open that the volume of the chamber is actually bigger therefore the compression ratio is smaller? So when cylinder is at TDC there is a valve (exhaust) that is still open?
8-to-1 - compression stroke
13-to-1 - expansion stroke
If you want to work out the geometry, the ratio should be roughly proportional to:
((intake_delay_close_in_degrees) / 180 degrees) * (max_cylinder_volume/min_cylinder_volume)
Due to the geometry of the connecting rod, there will be some variance but for a rough approximation, this should be close enough.
Bob Wilson
#20
Re: 87 vs 91 octane for better mpg?
Using 93 octane in my insight
gives me more power during lean-burn.
That results in higher MPG.
.............because I can avoid using rich-burn when climbing gentle slopes (I left out that key piece). That's the compression-to-expansion ratio. Prius has an abnormally large expansion, but the same compression as any other car, so there won't be any pre-ignition of the fuel even with 85 octane.
gives me more power during lean-burn.
That results in higher MPG.
.............because I can avoid using rich-burn when climbing gentle slopes (I left out that key piece). That's the compression-to-expansion ratio. Prius has an abnormally large expansion, but the same compression as any other car, so there won't be any pre-ignition of the fuel even with 85 octane.