ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
#11
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
2008
FWD
3.15 (No *)
No Nav
No Recall announced
Do not seem to get Bat Temp. All other codes I pluged in work.
Last edited by 08hybridok; 01-15-2008 at 03:14 PM. Reason: Finally confirmed version.
#12
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
UPDATE:
If you have version 3.15 firmware, please double check the SG version and report (or edit your post) to indicate whether it is
3.15
OR
3.15*
The "*" symbol would appear by the upper right hand button on the SG.
Thanks to DesertDog for noting this difference.
If you have version 3.15 firmware, please double check the SG version and report (or edit your post) to indicate whether it is
3.15
OR
3.15*
The "*" symbol would appear by the upper right hand button on the SG.
Thanks to DesertDog for noting this difference.
#14
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
SoC works, Yes/No
>>yes
model year
>>2006
FWD/AWD
>>AWD
ScanGaugeII firmware version (MORE>MORE>MORE>VERSION) Include "*" symbol if present
>>Don't know, I'll have to check
Factory NAV system, Yes/No
>>yes, but I removed it
Battery Harness Recall, Fix/No Fix
>>no
~John
>>yes
model year
>>2006
FWD/AWD
>>AWD
ScanGaugeII firmware version (MORE>MORE>MORE>VERSION) Include "*" symbol if present
>>Don't know, I'll have to check
Factory NAV system, Yes/No
>>yes, but I removed it
Battery Harness Recall, Fix/No Fix
>>no
~John
#17
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
It seems extremely likely that the issue is with the 3.15* version. This is actually not a software rev, but the asterisk indicates a different microprocessor. Hopefully Ron can figure out why the battery xgauges aren't working with that processor. I can't remember if the * means the old or new microprocessor.....
For those that can't read the battery air temp, I suggest trying the Battery Average Module Temperature Tav.
For those that can't read the battery air temp, I suggest trying the Battery Average Module Temperature Tav.
#18
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
Carl,
I previously posted. FYI, my 08 FEH AWD, SGII-xgauge, Tav DOES work, but Batt Air Temp (BTM) has never worked. I'm pretty much convinced that the 08 has a different PID for BTM, but can't prove/disprove. I also wish that Ron @ Linerar Logic can solve this one before summer
I previously posted. FYI, my 08 FEH AWD, SGII-xgauge, Tav DOES work, but Batt Air Temp (BTM) has never worked. I'm pretty much convinced that the 08 has a different PID for BTM, but can't prove/disprove. I also wish that Ron @ Linerar Logic can solve this one before summer
#19
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
Tav DOES work in my 2005, and DOES match the car message center display, and as far as I can tell, Tav is what the car uses to make decisions about battery cooling, etc. So it looks like this is the one to watch.
I have no idea what the other one (BTM) is measureing, but this A.M. was several degrees colder than Tav.
I always get a number for BTM, but the number is very slow to change.
Could this be measured in the air duct in the side panel perhaps above the blend door, so that when I use my battery and get it "warm" this number does not change if the door is closed? Carl, maybe you see faster updates in warm weather, because the door is open in warm weather?
-John
I have no idea what the other one (BTM) is measureing, but this A.M. was several degrees colder than Tav.
I always get a number for BTM, but the number is very slow to change.
Could this be measured in the air duct in the side panel perhaps above the blend door, so that when I use my battery and get it "warm" this number does not change if the door is closed? Carl, maybe you see faster updates in warm weather, because the door is open in warm weather?
-John
#20
Re: ScanGaugeII and SoC XGauge
I also seem to have
NO MxC, DxC,Tmx, Tmn, Tav, or Txc
Thats essentially everything that has to do with temperature and charge limits in the battery. My guess would be that the BCM flash on the recall MOVED some of the locations for these values and we are going to have to find the new ones
NO MxC, DxC,Tmx, Tmn, Tav, or Txc
Thats essentially everything that has to do with temperature and charge limits in the battery. My guess would be that the BCM flash on the recall MOVED some of the locations for these values and we are going to have to find the new ones