Electric Vehicle Forums - Page 66 of 77 - Plug In to the latest EV news, discussions, and how-to guides.

Which Is Selling Better: 2011 Chevy Volt Or 2011 Nissan Leaf?

The first business day of every month is when automakers release sales data for the previous month. Today, we got January’s sales figures, which are an improvement over last January’s.

But the question that we keep hearing is: Which sells better, the 2011 Nissan Leaf or the 2011 Chevrolet Volt?

They’re the first two plug-in electric vehicles sold in the U.S. by major manufacturers in a decade, and now they’ve been on sale for roughly six weeks. The first Leaf was delivered in San Francisco on December 12, and the first Volt followed three days later in New Jersey.

First 2011 Chevrolet Volt delivered to retail buyer Jeffrey Kaffee, in Denville, NJ, December 2010

Thus far (as of yesterday), the Volt is decisively in the lead, with a total of 647 cars delivered through the end of January. That represents 326 in December, plus 321 more last month.

In comparison, only 106 Nissan Leafs have been delivered: 19 in December, and 87 last month.

(For the record, Smart also delivered its very first Smart ForTwo Electric Drive last month as well.)

Don’t go jumping to conclusions about which car will do better in the marketplace, though. Both the Volt and the Leaf are heavily back-ordered, and only modest numbers of each will be built during 2011 as the production line and supply chain ramp up.

First Smart ForTwo Electric Drive with Roger Penske and Smart USA president Jill Lajdziak, Jan 2011

Nissan has said it will build 20,000 Leafs for the U.S. market–out of global production of 50,000–this year, and Chevrolet initially committed to 10,000 Volts, all of them for the U.S.

In light of robust demand for Volts, however, General Motors CEO Dan Akerson has said the company is looking at ways to raise production this year, perhaps to 20,000 or more. It also accelerated the pace of Volt rollouts nationwide, so that the range-extended electric car will be available in all 50 states by the end of this year.

It won’t be until 2013, when Nissan quintuples its global Leaf production capacity to 250,000, that true market demand for plug-in cars starts to become apparent. Until then, early adopters and green-minded organizations are likely to snap up every one that hits a showroom floor.

[Nissan; General Motors; Smart]

 

This story originally appeared at Green Car Repor

By: | February 4, 2011


Technical Details Revealed: 2012 Audi Q5 Hybrid Crossover

Sometimes you just never know where you’ll dredge up technical details on vehicles that carmakers haven’t yet launched.

Technology conferences can be a good source. Take, for instance, the Advanced Automotive Battery Conference (AABC) held last week in Pasadena, California.

A battery systems engineer from Audi laid out full details of the hybrid-electric drive system in the upcoming Audi Q5 Hybrid, a vehicle that has been described only at Audi technology seminars for invited audiences and hasn’t officially been revealed to the public.

LA no-show

The only public sign of the 2012 Audi Q5 Hybrid so far, in fact, has been a video teaser. Despite rumors, Audi’s first-ever hybrid was not unveiled at the 2010 Los Angeles Auto Show last November.

Instead, it will be launched in Europe this spring, probably at the Geneva Motor Show, and will go on sale in Europe and North America at the end of the year.

Second-generation hybrid

The Q5 Hybrid is the second generation of the Volkswagen Group’s hybrid development efforts. The first generation produced the 2011 Volkswagen Touareg Hybrid and the 2011 Porsche Cayenne S Hybrid, based on larger crossovers than the mid-sized Q5.

While those vehicles used a 3.0-liter supercharged V-6 engine and a nickel-metal-hydride battery pack, the new Q5 Hybrid uses a smaller 208-horsepower, 2.0-liter direct-injected and turbocharged four-cylinder engine, along with the group’s first-ever lithium-ion battery pack.

The 2.0-liter four is similar to the smaller of the two engines offered in U.S.-market Q5 models (the other is a 270-hp, 3.2-liter V-6). But Audi has adapted it to hybrid use by fitting electrically-driven ancillaries for such functions as power steering and air conditioning.

44-hp electric motor

Directly behind the engine is a 33-kilowatt (44-hp) motor-generator unit, followed by a 8-speed Tiptronic automatic transmission whose torque converter has been replaced with an oil pump. The engine coolant system also cools the electric motor.

The engine and transmission modifications ensure that all vehicle systems continue to function even when the engine switches off, either at rest or during periods of “gliding” when the car is propelled only on electricity under light load at speeds up to 62 miles per hour.

The maximum electric range of the Q5 Hybrid is slightly less than 2 miles, under the right combination of speed, load, and temperature conditions.

Less than 300 pounds more

With the 1.3-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack weighing in at just 77 pounds, the entire hybrid system adds less than 300 pounds to the weight of the base Q5.

The pack is air-cooled, but Audi has fitted the battery with its own air-conditioning system, which cools it far more quickly than forced-air cooling would.

Consumption on the European test cycle was 33.6 miles per gallon, though EPA ratings are likely to be lower due to differences in the tests. Audi’s performance figures say the Q5 Hybrid does 0 to 62 mph in 7.1 seconds, with a top speed of 138 miles per hour.

Audi plans to offer a battery warranty of at least seven years, according to its presentation.

[Green Car Congress]

This story originally appeared at Green Car Repor

By: | February 3, 2011


2012 Ford Focus: First Drive

While it’s easy to find a good, sensibly-sized and relatively fuel-efficient small car, it’s really hard to find much personality.

At the same time, you could argue, Americans haven’t seemed to want much charm behind the wheel. The first-generation Focus, for instance, came in a wide range of body styles (including three- and five-door hatchbacks), and had a standard of ride and handling arguably better than anything in its class at the time, but it became a sore reality after a few years that Americans weren’t willing to pay for small-car sophistication. A couple of refreshes cut body styles from the lineup and left the Focus feeling a little more refined, but also more conservative.

Times have definitely changed since then—and they’ve definitely changed since the last time Ford went to the drawing board for its last 2007 refresh of the Focus, when the vehicle lost all its hatchback styles, gained Sync connectivity as a central selling point, but lost its hatchback body styles, became more conservative-looking, and lost even more of the dynamic spirit of that original Focus.

While Hyundai has simplified its Elantra down to just a handful of build combinations, Ford is offering a wide range of possibilities for the 2012 Focus, to serve as everything from basic transportation (for those who still think of small cars as ‘economy cars’) to a small family’s primary vehicle—or even a surprisingly sophisticated sport sedan.

Two shapely body styles

Now, shoppers have two beautiful body styles—a four-door sedan or five-door hatchback—from which to choose. They’re both rakish and sleek, and while the profile of the Focus sedan is uncommon (and remarkably close to that of the recently introduced Chevrolet Cruze, as well as the Elantra), the distinction is in the details. Both models have Ford’s kinetic design attributes, with the rising beltline that’s become par, but accented here with some nice creases and curves—including a subtle curve that runs from the headlights all the way to the taillights, just below the beltline, and a sharper crease that starts after the front wheelwell and runs through the door handles. Taillamps are huge and form much of the rear corners on both vehicles. Thankfully, Ford’s saccharine chrome louvered grille, from several of its larger vehicles, and which we never warmed up to, hasn’t been carried over here.

Inside, the design is complex—incorporating a cockpit-like instrument panel arrangement, with a thick center stack, some nice surface sculpting, and vertically-oriented vents. Trims and finishes look classy and inviting, and there’s a nicely tailored look to the entire interior that extends to door trim and even seats. The turquoise-colored gauge pointers are a nice touch.

While turbocharged EcoBoost power is on the way, the Focus lineup includes a single engine now, an all-new 2.0-liter direct-injected four-cylinder making 160 horsepower and 146 pound-feet of torque; that’s 20 hp and 10 pound-feet than before, though when you correct for the 200-300-pound weight gain of the new Focus it’s no big bump. The new mill has Ti-VCT variable valve timing, though, and can be paired with either a five-speed manual gearbox or six-speed PowerShift dual-clutch automatic.

Engine is very smooth, but needs to be revved

The engine settles to one of the smoothest idles we’ve noted in a small-car; direct-injection engines can be rather noisy at idle—sounding almost a little diesel-like at times—but engineers have done a great job here in masking those sounds.

2.0-liter GDI Duratec - 2012 Ford FocusAlthough the new engine carries the Duratec name, it has a very different character than the other U.S.-market powerplants that get that moniker; in short, you have to rev this engine to tap into its perky side. It’s in a few rare instances—like coming out of a tight corner in third when we should have been in second—that the new engine’s relative (and surprising, given the valve system) lack of low-rev torque is highlighted. The engine feels nearly lifeless below 2,000 rpm, but rev it above 3,000 and it really begins to hit its stride; peak torque is at 4,450 rpm. Luckily it’s refined and entirely lacking the boominess that used to be a small-car norm. But Ford has done a good job in making the Focus feel light-footed off the line, with low first-gear ratios in either gearbox, and the dual-clutch gearbox does a great job keeping the revs high and uninterrupted. Take off, foot to the floor, and the Focus feels quick.

 

Overall, the calibration of the PowerShift automatic feels much more relaxed in the Focus than in the Fiesta, where we’ve criticized it for being a little lurchy and lumpy at times. Whether it’s the Focus’s additional weight, the engine’s additional torque, or the software recalibration an engineer told us it got, the gearbox feels much more at ease here—more responsive, too.

PowerShift better than in Fiesta

If you want to do the shifting yourself, you have to make do with a little +/- button on the side of the shift knob; rather than slamming the knob in one direction or another, or clicking a paddle-shifter, you might just miss your shift as you hunt for the button. Fortunately, the PowerShift transmission does come with a Sport (‘S’) mode, just below Drive, which smartly holds revs for grades and corners, holds upshifts significantly longer, and downshifts a gear with the slightest tap of the brake pedal. Just don’t leave it in Drive on hilly canyon roads, as we tried briefly, as it will hunt around indecisively. It’s also odd that no matter what your selection, Ford seems to have dialed engine braking out completely. And on the subject of brakes, there’s nothing to complain about; S and SE models come with rear-drums instead of discs (in the name of cost-cutting), but pedal feel and stopping power felt about the same at legal speeds.

The other option for shifting yourself is the five-speed manual gearbox—which is only offered on S and SE, not SEL or Titanium, by the way. The linkage is sweet, if a bit long, and while the clutch feel is soft for easygoing normal driving it felt if anything a bit too soft for strong launches. A taller fifth gear would also be helpful; with revs hanging around the 3,000-rpm click at 70 mpg—significantly higher than the PowerShift’s sixth gear—we could see how highway fuel economy could be a bit lower.

The Focus proved economical in some of the least economical driving conditions. We saw 22 mpg in about 50 miles of driving up canyon roads, with more up than down, in a PowerShift vehicle, then 28 mpg in about 70 miles of more twisties followed by creeping-and-racing LA freeway driving. Ford has backtracked a little bit—or refined its message, it might say—about the Focus’s 40-mpg mileage claim. Just as with the Fiesta, the Focus will achieve that number with an SFE package, only offered initially on the sedan.

Ride and handling? Awesome.

Whi
le the powertrain requires a little diligence, the ride-and-handling compromises are about the best it gets. The Focus handles as well as—or better than—the most deft handler in the class, the Mazda3, with a suspension that doesn’t crash and bang over rough transitions, nor punishes over heaves or potholes. Ford’s electric power steering system provides nice weighting and it performs well, providing precise control but not transmitting much feel of the road. The electric steering system is awesome in transitions, too, never binding up or feeling off its game. While the suspension allows a bit of give, it loads and unloads in the most transparent, predictable way possible, yet isolates you from harshness. On one of the tightest stretches of roads with a Titanium sedan, we felt like the Focus was on our side, filtering out what we didn’t need to know but keeping our line tight and neat. And on boulevards and freeways, the ride is on the firm side compared to other compacts like the Cruze, Elantra, and Corolla, but not enough to ever be punishing.

 

The Focus is extremely comfortable inside—glovelike when fitted with the Sport package, which our Titanium test vehicle included. The moderately bolstered seats proved perfect for holding us in place in the twisties, for all the grip that the excellent Michelin Pilot Sport SP3 summer performance tires could provide. Whether you choose the sedan or hatchback, you get back seat accommodations that are virtually the same, with just enough legroom and headroom to fit even those over six feet. With the leather upholstery, the back seats are trimmed like those of a high-end German luxury car, with exposed stitching and true bolstering for outboard occupants.

Cargo holds in the hatch and sedan are both ample with large openings, but seat-folding was a little disappointing. For one, you can’t release the back seats remotely, as you can in some other vehicles; the other thing is that the back seats don’t fold completely flat, and unless the front seats are slid far forward, the headrests get in the way.

Although the vehicles we sampled in Southern California weren’t yet production vehicles, the Ford Focus has a sense of solidity and build quality inside that far surpasses that of the previous model, as well as most other cars in this class. Door close with a nice, satisfying thunk, and door grabs, trim, and center console all seem solidly attached.

Touch screen or not?

Depending on which trim you get, the Focus has two quite different instrument panels. While MyFord Touch—the touch-screen system that’s offered in the 2011 Ford Explorer and Edge and 2011 Lincoln MKX—is standard on the Focus Titanium and optional on the SEL, other models get a modestly retouched version of the Fiesta’s control layout—including the oddly angled, V-shaped arrangement. Top and center on those models, instead, is a more colorful, higher-contrast screen that definitely beats the orange monochrome Fiesta screen.

Just as in those other models, MyFord touch provides control of entertainment, communication, climate functions, and more, and in these models, in place of the two smaller gauge-cluster screens that you find in the Edge, Explorer, and MKX, the Focus gets a single smaller one. Just below the touch-screen, deceptively, is a very large dial in the middle of the dash that you might would serve some function in navigating screen functions, but it’s only for sound-system volume.

There are a number of redundancies. Throughout the line, Ford has moved a host of functions to the steering wheel, and we’re going to have to wait for a longer drive to report back on whether they serve in making it easier or more confusing. And MyFord Touch includes an extended set of Sync voice commands.

Essentially, Ford is giving shoppers a choice this time around as to whether they want a basic small car or a much more sophisticated one with all the features and options of a larger one. Prices on the Focus range from $16,995, including destination, for the base Focus S, up to about $27k for a loaded Titanium. S models are quite basic, but they do include air conditioning, CD sound, and a tilt/telescopic steering wheel. SE models add cruise control, larger wheels, fog lamps, and Ford’s MyKey system, while SEL trims get SYNC, dual-zone climate control, and upgraded trims. At the top of the line, the Titanium earns you MyFord Touch, an upgraded ten-speaker Sony sound system, HD Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio, sport seats, a sport suspension, and sport wheels with summer performance tires. A number of the Titanium’s features—including the Sport package—are optional on the SEL.

Active parking, in a small car

One segment-exclusive feature that will be available in the Titanium is Active Park Assist—that’s the system Ford has offered on several more expensive models that essentially allows the car to steer itself into a spot while you modulate the brake. In a city-savvy small car like the Focus—rather than one that’s more likely to be valet-parked—it finally makes sense.

Overall the Focus feels way sportier and more charismatic than most vehicles in this class, and it stands out on a lot of levels. Interior in Focus looks better than Elantra, but doesn’t necessarily feel better. Elantra might have it in features for the dollar, and the Chevrolet Cruze is a strong entry for comfort-oriented buyers, but in features and performance, the U.S.-built Focus is on top.

Post fuel spikes and economic woes, are Americans finally ready to embrace well-equipped small cars—especially those with a little more personality? If so, the new 2012 Ford Focus provides the most compelling proposition yet.

If you’re looking for a sensibly-sized and relatively fuel-efficient small car, it’s really hard to find much personality.

 

At the same time, you could argue, Americans haven’t seemed to want much charm behind the wheel. The first-generation Focus, for instance, came in a wide range of body styles (including three- and five-door hatchbacks), and had a standard of ride and handling arguably better than anything in its class at the time, but it became a sore reality after a few years that Americans weren’t willing to pay for small-car sophistication. A couple of refreshes cut body styles from the lineup and left the Focus feeling a little more refined, but also more conservative.

 

Times have definitely changed since then—and they’ve definitely changed since the last time Ford went to the drawing board for its last 2007 refresh of the Focus, when the vehicle lost all its hatchback styles, gained Sync connectivity as a central selling point, but lost its hatchback body styles, became more conservative-looking, and lost even more of the dynamic spirit of that original Focus.

 

While Hyundai has simplified its Elantra down to just a handful of build combinations, Ford is offering a wide range of possibilities for the 2012 Focus, to serve as everything from basic transportation (for those who still think of small cars as ‘economy cars’) to a small family’s primary vehicle—or even a surprisingly sophisticated sport sedan.

 

Two shapely body styles

 

Now, shoppers have two beautiful body styles—a four-door sedan or five-door hatchback—from which to choose. They’re both rakish and sleek, and while the profile of the Focus sedan is uncommon (and remarkably close to that of the recently introduced Chevrolet Cruze, as well as the Elantra), the distinction is in the details. Both models have Ford’s kinetic design attributes, with the rising beltline that’s become par, but accented here with some nice creases and curves—including a subtle curve that runs from the headlights all the way to the taillights, just below the beltline, and a sharper crease that starts after the front wheelwell and runs through the door handles. Taillamps are huge and form much of the rear corners on both vehicles. Thankfully, Ford’s saccharine chrome louvered grille, from several of its larger vehicles, and which we never warmed up to, hasn’t been carried over here.

 

Inside, the design is complex—incorporating a cockpit-like instrument panel arrangement, with a thick center stack, some nice surface sculpting, and vertically-oriented vents. Trims and finishes look classy and inviting, and there’s a nicely tailored look to the entire interior that extends to door trim and even seats. The turquoise-colored gauge pointers are a nice touch.

 

While turbocharged EcoBoost power is on the way, the Focus lineup includes a single engine now, an all-new 2.0-liter direct-injected four-cylinder making 160 horsepower and 146 pound-feet of torque; that’s 20 hp and 10 pound-feet than before, though when you correct for the 200-300-pound weight gain of the new Focus it’s no big bump. The new mill has Ti-VCT variable valve timing, though, and can be paired with either a five-speed manual gearbox or six-speed PowerShift dual-clutch automatic.

 

Engine is very smooth, but needs to be revved

 

The engine settles to one of the smoothest idles we’ve noted in a small-car; direct-injection engines can be rather noisy at idle—sounding almost a little diesel-like at times—but engineers have done a great job here in masking those sounds.

 

Although the new engine carries the Duratec name, it has a very different character than the other U.S.-market powerplants that get that moniker; in short, you have to rev this engine to tap into its perky side. It’s in a few rare instances—like coming out of a tight corner in third when we should have been in second—that the new engine’s relative (and surprising, given the valve system) lack of low-rev torque is highlighted. The engine feels nearly lifeless below 2,000 rpm, but rev it above 3,000 and it really begins to hit its stride; peak torque is at 4,450 rpm. Luckily it’s refined and entirely lacking the boominess that used to be a small-car norm. But Ford has done a good job in making the Focus feel quick off the line, with low first-gear ratios in either gearbox, and the dual-clutch gearbox does a great job keeping the revs high and uninterrupted. Take off, foot to the floor, and the Focus feels quick.

 

Overall, the calibration of the PowerShift automatic feels much more relaxed in the Focus than in the Fiesta, where we’ve criticized it for being a little lurchy and lumpy at times. Whether it’s the Focus’s additional weight, the engine’s additional torque, or the software recalibration an engineer told us it got, the gearbox feels much more at ease here—more responsive, too.

 

PowerShift better than in Fiesta

 

If you want to do the shifting yourself, you have to make do with a little +/- button on the side of the shift knob; rather than slamming the knob in one direction or another, or clicking a paddle-shifter, you might just miss your shift as you hunt for the button. Fortunately, the PowerShift transmission does come with a Sport (‘S’) mode, just below Drive, which smartly holds revs for grades and corners, holds upshifts significantly longer, and downshifts a gear with the slightest tap of the brake pedal. Just don’t leave it in Drive on hilly canyon roads, as we tried briefly, as it will hunt around indecisively. It’s also odd that no matter what your selection, Ford seems to have dialed engine braking out completely. And on the subject of brakes, there’s nothing to complain about; S and SE models come with rear-drums instead of discs (in the name of cost-cutting), but pedal feel and stopping power felt about the same at legal speeds.

 

The other option for shifting yourself is the five-speed manual gearbox—which is only offered on S and SE, not SEL or Titanium, by the way. The linkage is sweet, if a bit long, and while the clutch feel is soft for easygoing normal driving it felt if anything a bit too soft for strong launches. A taller fifth gear would also be helpful; with revs hanging around the 3,000-rpm click at 70 mpg—significantly higher than the PowerShift’s sixth gear—we could see how highway fuel economy could be a bit lower.

 

The Focus proved economical in some of the least economical driving conditions. We saw 22 mpg in about 50 miles of driving up canyon roads, with more up than down, in a PowerShift vehicle, then 28 mpg in about 70 miles of more twisties followed by creeping-and-racing LA freeway driving. Ford has backtracked a little bit—or refined its message, it might say—about the Focus’s 40-mpg mileage claim. Just as with the Fiesta, the Focus will achieve that number with an SFE package, only offered initially on the sedan.

 

Ride and handling? Awesome.

 

While the powertrain requires a little diligence, the ride-and-handling compromises are about the best it gets. The Focus handles as well as—or better than—the most deft handler in the class, the Mazda3, with a suspension that doesn’t crash and bang over rough transitions, nor punishes over heaves or potholes. Ford’s electric power steering system provides nice weighting and it performs well, providing precise control but not transmitting much feel of the road. The electric steering system is awesome in transitions, too, never binding up or feeling off its game. While the suspension allows a bit of give, it loads and unloads in the most transparent, predictable way possible, yet isolates you from harshness. On one of the tightest stretches of roads with a Titanium sedan, we felt like the Focus was on our side, filtering out what we didn’t need to know but keeping our line tight and neat. And on boulevards and freeways, the ride is on the firm side compared to other compacts like the Cruze, Elantra, and Corolla, but not enough to ever be punishing.< /p>

 

The Focus is extremely comfortable inside—glovelike when fitted with the Sport package, which our Titanium test vehicle included. The moderately bolstered seats proved perfect for holding us in place in the twisties, for all the grip that the excellent Michelin Pilot Sport SP3 summer performance tires could provide. Whether you choose the sedan or hatchback, you get back seat accommodations that are virtually the same, with just enough legroom and headroom to fit even those over six feet. With the leather upholstery, the back seats are trimmed like those of a high-end German luxury car, with exposed stitching and true bolstering for outboard occupants.

 

Cargo holds in the hatch and sedan are both ample with large openings, but seat-folding was a little disappointing. For one, you can’t release the back seats remotely, as you can in some other vehicles; the other thing is that the back seats don’t fold completely flat, and unless the front seats are slid far forward, the headrests get in the way.

 

Although the vehicles we sampled in Southern California weren’t yet production vehicles, the Ford Focus has a sense of solidity and build quality inside that far surpasses that of the previous model, as well as most other cars in this class. Door close with a nice, satisfying thunk, and door grabs, trim, and center console all seem solidly attached.

 

Touch screen or not?

 

Depending on which trim you get, the Focus has two quite different instrument panels. While MyFord Touch—the touch-screen system that’s offered in the 2011 Ford Explorer and Edge and 2011 Lincoln MKX—is standard on the Focus Titanium and optional on the SEL, other models get a modestly retouched version of the Fiesta’s control layout—including the oddly angled, V-shaped arrangement. Top and center on those models, instead, is a more colorful, higher-contrast screen that definitely beats the orange monochrome Fiesta screen.

 

Just as in those other models, MyFord touch provides control of entertainment, communication, climate functions, and more, and in these models, in place of the two smaller gauge-cluster screens that you find in the Edge, Explorer, and MKX, the Focus gets a single smaller one. Just below the touch-screen, deceptively, is a very large dial in the middle of the dash that you might would serve some function in navigating screen functions, but it’s only for sound-system volume.

 

There are a number of redundancies. Throughout the line, Ford has moved a host of functions to the steering wheel, and we’re going to have to wait for a longer drive to report back on whether they serve in making it easier or more confusing. And MyFord Touch includes an extended set of Sync voice commands.

 

Essentially, Ford is giving shoppers a choice this time around as to whether they want a basic small car or a much more sophisticated one with all the features and options of a larger one. Prices on the Focus range from $16,995, including destination, for the base Focus S, up to about $27k for a loaded Titanium. S models are quite basic, but they do include air conditioning, CD sound, and a tilt/telescopic steering wheel. SE models add cruise control, larger wheels, fog lamps, and Ford’s MyKey system, while SEL trims get SYNC, dual-zone climate control, and upgraded trims. At the top of the line, the Titanium earns you MyFord Touch, an upgraded ten-speaker Sony sound system, HD Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio, sport seats, a sport suspension, and sport wheels with summer performance tires. A number of the Titanium’s features—including the Sport package—are optional on the SEL.

 

Active parking, in a small car

 

One segment-exclusive feature that will be available in the Titanium is Active Park Assist—that’s the system Ford has offered on several more expensive models that essentially allows the car to steer itself into a spot while you modulate the brake. In a city-savvy small car like the Focus—rather than one that’s more likely to be valet-parked—it finally makes sense.

 

Overall the Focus feels way sportier and more charismatic than most vehicles in this class, and it stands out on a lot of levels. Interior in Focus looks better than Elantra, but doesn’t necessarily feel better. Elantra might have it in features for the dollar, and the Chevrolet Cruze is a strong entry for comfort-oriented buyers, but in features and performance, the U.S.-built Focus is on top.

 

Post fuel spikes and economic woes, are Americans finally ready to embrace well-equipped small cars—especially those with a little more personality? If so, the new 2012 Ford Focus provides the most compelling proposition yet.

 

 

This story originally appeared at The Car Connecti

By: | February 2, 2011



GM’s Akerson Says Cadillac SRX Plug-In Hybrid ‘Likely’

Late last year reports of a plug-in hybrid version of the Cadillac SRX surfaced, and though GM did not confirm them, neither did it deny such a vehicle was in the works. Today GM CEO Dan Akerson, while talking about future EV and extended-range EV (EREV) strategy, revealed that the SRX plug-in is, in fact, “likely.”

The report, from the Detroit Free Press, puts the timeline in the 2012-2013 range. That mates well with previous reports, and it would fit with the need to give all of GM’s brands more green sheen.

A plug-in hybrid SRX would also be better positioned to compete with the likes of the Lexus RX Hybrid, or the possible diesels coming to Cadillac’s German competition in the near future.

Beyond the SRX, there are plans for more hybrids or electric-assisted vehicles, as well. The XTS Concept showed what such a drivetrain might look like in a flagship sedan, for example, and the Converj Concept previewed what may be the future of high-style electric coupes at the brand–though that’s certainly down the road.

Akerson also mentioned plans for an EREV hatchback, though what form that might take is anybody’s guess at this point. Could the new Sonic or the foreign-market hatchback version of the Cruze get the nod? Or will it be a variation on the Volt, a la the new Prius line? Whatever shape it takes, it will likely sport a version of the Volt’s powertrain. A multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) is also on the docket, according to Akerson.

Look for the new vehicles to start popping up at auto shows over the next year.

[Detroit Free Press]

This story originally appeared at Motor Authori

By: | January 31, 2011


Even Electric Cars Get Recalled: 2011 Think City Safety Notices

Recall notices are now a standard part of the automotive landscape. Last year’s recall of almost 10 million Toyota and Lexus models only highlighted the fact that most vehicles get called back to dealers for minor upgrades or inspections to fix or avert potential defects.

Despite their much smaller number of complex moving parts, there’s no reason electric cars should be exempt.

And indeed, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has now issued its first recall notice for the 2011 Think City, the two-seater electric car assembled in Elkhart, Indiana.

think city ev motorauthority 005

Reflecting Think’s low production rate, only 39 vehicles are involved in the pair of safety recalls. Sixteen cars may have a driver’s-side seat belt installed on the passenger side, meaning it’s missing a tensioner needed to retain a child seat properly if one is installed.

And another 23 Think City models may have inadequate defroster systems that fail to clear the inside of the windshield adequately, which could impede the driver’s vision in cold or humid weather. The defroster is powered by a separate liquid heating circuit that may not function properly.

In both cases, the affected parts will be removed and replaced by dealers if necessary.

If you’re one of the several dozen owners of a 2011 Think City, you can contact Think North America at 855-698-4465.

[Inside Line]

This story originally appeared at Green Car Repor

By: | January 31, 2011


2012 Fiat 500 Cabrio Coming Q2 2011, Abarth and EV In 2012

Fiat is poised to make its return to the United States, with the 500 Prima Edizione the forerunner of a flotilla of pint-sized hatches and convertibles. Already open for order and soon to start delivery, the manual-only Prima Edizione will be joined over the next year by the 500C Cabriolet, Abarth, and the all-electric 500 EV.

Starting at just $15,500, the Prima Edizione will set the standard for the models to follow, as well as the tone of Fiat’s return. The first of the follow-ons will be the 500C Cabriolet, due in the second quarter of this year as a 2012 model. Around the same time the standard Fiat 500 hatch will become available with a six-speed automatic transmission.

The 500C Cabriolet is, as we’ve seen from the European version, a 500 hatch with the entire roof removed and replaced with a sliding soft top, though the C-pillar and door arches remain. Also like the hatch, the 500C will share the same engine, which in the U.S. means a 1.4-liter Multiair engine rated at 101 horsepower. The 500C will also be available with a choice of manual or automatic transmissions.

Fiat 500 Abarth

After the 500C arrives, we’ll have to wait almost a full year for the first 500 Abarths to go on sale in the first quarter of 2012. The Abarth gets its power from a 1.4-liter turbocharged T-Jet engine, generating 135 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 132 pound-feet of torque at 2,500 rpm in Euro trim. U.S. specs have yet to be officially revealed, but should be nearly identical. In addition to the upraded powerplant, the Abarth will also sport unique exterior features including a full body kit, wider fenders, and Abarth badging. Due to its early 2012 arrival, the Abarth model is expected to wear a 2013 model designation.

Then it’s another long wait until the fourth quarter of 2012 for the 500 EV, the all-electric version of the car announced last year. Specs on the 500 EV remain even more elusive, likely because they haven’t been completely finalized, but a report from GreenCarReports’ John Voelcker quotes Chrysler PR manager Nick Cappa as saying the car will be best suited to “daily commuters who don’t travel more than 40 miles a day” though he added that total range would be “well beyond that.”

As for where you’ll be able to buy one, one third of the 130 dealers to get Fiat 500s will be former Saturn or Hummer dealers. With a network that large and re-purposed showrooms from the two dead brands, there should be a dealer within reasonable driving distance of most Americans.

For more on the 2012 Fiat 500, don’t miss Marty Padgett’s review of the Prima Edizione at TheCarConnection.

This story originally appeared at Motor Authori

By: | January 28, 2011


Obama Doubles Down on Plug-In Cars, More Policy Tweaks Coming

Last night, in his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama reiterated his support for expanding U.S. production and sales of plug-in cars that run on grid power.

Today, according to the Detroit News, a slew of policy changes will be unveiled by Vice President Joe Biden to advance that goal. Among other initiatives, the Administration will propose to convert the present $7,500 income-tax credit for electric-car buyers to a direct purchase rebate.

Purchase rebates, effectively refund checks that arrive within weeks of the buyer taking delivery, are widely accepted to be more effective than income-tax credits. Not all buyers qualify for such credits, and they can take as long as 15 months to realize, since they can only be claimed when taxes are filed the next year.

The president reiterated his campaign-trail goal of having one million plug-in vehicles on U.S. roads by 2015, a number that many industry analysts consider to be a stretch above what’s possible.

2011 Chevrolet Volt

In his address, Obama returned to themes of clean energy and oil independence, setting an even more audacious goal of having 80 percent of the nation’s power produced from “clean energy” sources by 2035, a quarter of a century hence.

The President said he will ask Congress to end billions of dollars of tax breaks for the oil industry, which he called “yesterday’s energy” and use those funds for higher investments in a variety of clean-energy programs.

In roughly three weeks, Obama will release his budget proposal, which White House officials said would include an additional $2 billion in funds to enable more regions and communities to install infrastructure to support plug-in vehicles. That would primarily include recharging stations, both public and private.

Today, Biden will visit a lithium-ion cell plant in Mount Comfort, Indiana, owned by Ener1 [NASDAQ:HEV], where he’s expected to announce further details of the president’s proposals.

[Detroit News]

This story originally appeared at Green Car Repor

By: | January 27, 2011



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 PM.