Eisenhower tunnel anyone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:31 AM
Mr. Kite's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 713
Default Re: Eisenhower tunnel anyone

Originally Posted by Benton
So, seriously, what did you feed Google? Picking keywords to get a best result can be an art, but to fail completely?
I really don't remember, but I was trying to find something that talked about the power loss in modern (fuel-injected) engines. At the time I was skeptical, all the references I ran across either specifically talked about carbureted engines or were ambiguous.
 
  #22  
Old 05-04-2008, 09:02 AM
Temujin's Avatar
Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6
Default Re: Eisenhower tunnel anyone

Originally Posted by Mr. Kite
I admitted I was wrong four months ago. Try reading post #15.

Nice first post.
Dear Mr. Kite,

After "Obviously you have none" we receive what you must believe constitutes manifest contrition in "OK, I was wrong" followed by instructions to re-read that poor excuse for an apology for bad manners. Or is it perhaps that you did not think that "Obviously you have none" was plain rude behaviour and that saying "OK, I was wrong" made it all go away?

Temujin
 
  #23  
Old 05-06-2008, 10:37 AM
Mr. Kite's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 713
Default Re: Eisenhower tunnel anyone

Originally Posted by Temujin
Dear Mr. Kite,

After "Obviously you have none" we receive what you must believe constitutes manifest contrition in "OK, I was wrong" followed by instructions to re-read that poor excuse for an apology for bad manners. Or is it perhaps that you did not think that "Obviously you have none" was plain rude behaviour and that saying "OK, I was wrong" made it all go away?

Temujin
Do you really want to debate whether or not I should have been contrite and whether or not my statement expressed contrition?

I think I'll find something more productive to do with my time.
 
  #24  
Old 05-09-2008, 07:20 AM
shiba3420's Avatar
Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 42
Default Re: Eisenhower tunnel anyone

Boy I can't believe we are still talking about this. Yes some people seemed to be getting a little upset in their writing, but frankly they were being prodded like cattle. At this point we have an answer and I can replicate Mr. Kites results. If anyone would like to do so, go back to the begining of the thread and look at the train of thought at any given point, and use appropriate search criteria for that time. Sure, looking back now we can modify our search and get more accurate results, but the statement stays the same.
Cars loose power at altitute like any other engine. Newer tech can offset that.

If you want to see something really sad, look for the people who talk about cars that should have less power but better mileage at altitute, and they base that on planes flying 300 plus miles per hour wanting to go their highest operating altitute for best mileage. They don't seem to realize there is a huge difference in a car with a little 60mph wind resistance, and a huge 'ol plane barraling through massive amounts of air. I suspect that a plane operating at 30k has more power than a stationary plane at full throttle. Surely 300/500mph of even "thin" wind has got to more than make up for the pressure lost...its natures turbo charger.

Well, I'm out of this thread. Everything that needs to have been said has been said.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
leepark
Toyota Camry Hybrid
4
10-06-2006 08:08 AM
wallpad
Toyota Camry Hybrid
7
08-19-2006 02:03 PM



Quick Reply: Eisenhower tunnel anyone


Contact Us -

  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 PM.