View Poll Results: Do you give permission to republish content provided by you contained in the FAQ?
No, I do not give my permission.



0
0%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll
May I port the FAQ to another site?
Hi folks,
In the interest of spreading knowledge, I would like to port the FAQ to another site. Since a number of us on this forum had input into the creation of the FAQ (with extra care given by Haroldo), I would like to open it to a poll so that we can vote on the idea.
If anyone thinks this is a horrible idea, please let me know.
If this offends anyone, I apologize!
If you did not provide content for the FAQ, no need to vote.
Thanks,
Mike
In the interest of spreading knowledge, I would like to port the FAQ to another site. Since a number of us on this forum had input into the creation of the FAQ (with extra care given by Haroldo), I would like to open it to a poll so that we can vote on the idea.
If anyone thinks this is a horrible idea, please let me know.
If this offends anyone, I apologize!
If you did not provide content for the FAQ, no need to vote.
Thanks,
Mike
Last edited by mikieboyblue; Mar 24, 2009 at 07:40 PM.
It's a nice idea, but, trust me, it's a lot of work (even if you're just cutting and pasting).
But why re-create the wheel (or re-invent fire, if you prefer)?
Information can easily be shared via links. If the FAQ here contains good stuff, just pop a link in your signature and/or create a sticky to the FAQ pointing to the FAQ. Some (but thankfully, not too many) web sites are territorial and might not like the practice, but check with a mod or admin to see if they'll allow it.
The FAQ took quite a few hours to compile. A link takes seconds.
To get back and answer your question, everything posted is in a public forum and I, for one, understand that anyone can copy anything, so go for it.
But why re-create the wheel (or re-invent fire, if you prefer)?
Information can easily be shared via links. If the FAQ here contains good stuff, just pop a link in your signature and/or create a sticky to the FAQ pointing to the FAQ. Some (but thankfully, not too many) web sites are territorial and might not like the practice, but check with a mod or admin to see if they'll allow it.
The FAQ took quite a few hours to compile. A link takes seconds.
To get back and answer your question, everything posted is in a public forum and I, for one, understand that anyone can copy anything, so go for it.
Last edited by haroldo; Mar 25, 2009 at 03:42 AM.
It's a nice idea, but, trust me, it's a lot of work (even if you're just cutting and pasting).
But why re-create the wheel (or re-invent fire, if you prefer)?
Information can easily be shared via links. If the FAQ here contains good stuff, just pop a link in your signature and/or create a sticky to the FAQ pointing to the FAQ. Some (but thankfully, not too many) web sites are territorial and might not like the practice, but check with a mod or admin to see if they'll allow it.
The FAQ took quite a few hours to compile. A link takes seconds.
To get back and answer your question, everything posted is in a public forum and I, for one, understand that anyone can copy anything, so go for it.
But why re-create the wheel (or re-invent fire, if you prefer)?
Information can easily be shared via links. If the FAQ here contains good stuff, just pop a link in your signature and/or create a sticky to the FAQ pointing to the FAQ. Some (but thankfully, not too many) web sites are territorial and might not like the practice, but check with a mod or admin to see if they'll allow it.
The FAQ took quite a few hours to compile. A link takes seconds.
To get back and answer your question, everything posted is in a public forum and I, for one, understand that anyone can copy anything, so go for it.
Always such a great voice of reason....Yes, it would be work. I'm checking on the web linking.
Some sites, mainly commercial sites (CNET.com, for example) strongly discourage linking to other sites, even when the other site has superior information.
Others (including one where I am an admin and co-founder) encourage the free flow of information and ideas.
FWIW, when I learned of CNET's policy, I left and never returned...and helped set up the other site. Their loss.
Actually, instead of posting a FAQ (mine is a bit tired and probably needs a refresh) to a forum, I'd rather see it in a wiki setting where every/anyone can collaborate and contribute. Anyone know of such a place where this could be accomplished?
Others (including one where I am an admin and co-founder) encourage the free flow of information and ideas.
FWIW, when I learned of CNET's policy, I left and never returned...and helped set up the other site. Their loss.
Actually, instead of posting a FAQ (mine is a bit tired and probably needs a refresh) to a forum, I'd rather see it in a wiki setting where every/anyone can collaborate and contribute. Anyone know of such a place where this could be accomplished?
I'm looking at getting user pages or wikis add to MHC as those are a better place for DIY and FAQ information.
Yes, that's why some sites have issues with "web linking."
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







