Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #21  
Sooty's Avatar
Active Enthusiast
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 231
From: Calgary, AB Canada
Default Re: Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

Originally Posted by chestr
My commute came out to 16.68 miles with elevations from -16 to 259 ft.
I should be so lucky.

I would expect vehicles at sea level like yourself to get better mileage than someone like me.

My commute is 12.96 miles but elevations vary between 3,503' and 3,956'
 
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #22  
H2O Doctor's Avatar
Active Enthusiast
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 215
From: Southern California
Arrow Re: Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

Originally Posted by haroldo
While the car's engine works harder going uphill than it does going down, the swing in MPG might also be due to the slope of the gas in the tank when you are going uphill versus down. When you are going uphill, the gas sloshes to the back of the tank and, depending on where the sensor is located, the car is fooled into thinking you have more (or less) gas than you really have. If it thinks you have more gas, the the calculated mileage statistics (on the dash) will show an increased efficiency.
The gauges range from being a little inaccurate to very innacurate.
Best to take the miles per tank and divide by the gas station's meter to determine mileage.
Anything else (gauges and dials in car) is guesstimates, at best.

I have found the MFD to be very accurate. I'm sure you're not familiar with the grapevine. There is a large increase in elevation to reach the summit and then you drive for quite a few miles before descending. I took readings when the car was at level spots so you're idea that it was the slope was not a factor. It looks at fuel consumed not at level in the tank.
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 03:48 AM
  #23  
jayw_TCH's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 25
From: South East Michigan
Default Re: Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

I choose another route home yesterday. (This is my 40 mile one way commute I do twice a week.) Thanks to the elevation map, I noticed another route that doesn't drop down 300 feet in the middle of the commute. On nearly a half tank, according to the Fuel computer, I am at 40 MPG exactly.

Thanks for posting that elevation map!
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #24  
coolshock1's Avatar
Driving in stealth mode
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 430
From: Far South Chicago Burbs
Default Re: Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

No problem. I am glad to finally return the helps as so many others have helped me. I never paid attention to the hills until I got my TCH.
 
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 09:35 AM
  #25  
SPL's Avatar
SPL
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 859
From: Waterloo, ON
Default Re: Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

My understanding is that the fuel usage is computed by the engine ECU from the fuel-injector pulse data. The amount of fuel injected per pulse is known by the ECU. The FE in mpg (or the FC in L/100 km) is then computed from the amount of fuel used and distance covered. The fuel tank gauge, and its (in)accuracy, play no role in this computation.

Stan
 
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #26  
FastMover's Avatar
Old Boomer Techie
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 572
From: Pacific Northwest (WA)
Default Re: Effects of Terrain (Region) on Mileage

Originally Posted by SPL
My understanding is that the fuel usage is computed by the engine ECU from the fuel-injector pulse data. The amount of fuel injected per pulse is known by the ECU. The FE in mpg (or the FC in L/100 km) is then computed from the amount of fuel used and distance covered. The fuel tank gauge, and its (in)accuracy, play no role in this computation.

Stan

Correct! The same technique has been used in general aviation piston powered aircraft that are fuel injected for many years. The only difference is that the fuel used is related to time and expressed as Gallons per Hour (GPH) or, for diesels or other aircraft that use Jet A, Pounds per Hour (PPH). This is then used with the caluclated ground speed to calculate range remaining, usually in Nautical Miles (NM). The accuracy can be quite good, and is actually required by regulations to be within 2%.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jefferson
Ford Escape Hybrid
9
Jul 22, 2008 06:32 AM
PriusNut
Toyota Prius
38
Oct 4, 2006 06:14 AM
ericbecky
Fuel Economy & Emissions
0
Jun 4, 2004 02:20 PM



Contact Us -

  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:11 AM.