Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
#1
Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
The 2007 Camry's were rated marginal for rear protection in an accident in the latest Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ratings news release for 2007 cars and SUVs. The Camry was rated good(highest ranking) in side and front protection.
See this link for the news release:
http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr112106.html
See this link for the news release:
http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr112106.html
#2
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
I saw that article recently. I'm thankful that the headrest actually fits me so well. My '99 Passat's front seat headrests were adjustable forward/backward. So were my father's '83 Camry's. Not at all sure why such a nice car would lack that feature. (Not to mention folding side mirrors.)
#3
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
The headrest fits me well, but my wife is shorter, and the way it's shaped hits the top of her head, tilting it forward. In a rear end accident, I worry that her neck would be hurt.
I would love to see Toyota come out with a different headrest for the TCH. (and I also wonder why the TCH doesn't have folding side mirrors...)
I would love to see Toyota come out with a different headrest for the TCH. (and I also wonder why the TCH doesn't have folding side mirrors...)
#4
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
Re: Headrests
I test drove the Civic Hybrid before deciding on a Camry Hybrid. It has the new headrests that are suppose to move forward and upward in a collision. All well and good, but they are not adjustable, and are way too forward already. I actually got a headache from the test drive, and it also bothered my wife's neck too. In the forums, people are even replacing them with headrests from 2006 Accords.
So, it could be worse! The TCH headrest is still a bit too forward for me, but ok (from what I remember...I receive my car next week).
I test drove the Civic Hybrid before deciding on a Camry Hybrid. It has the new headrests that are suppose to move forward and upward in a collision. All well and good, but they are not adjustable, and are way too forward already. I actually got a headache from the test drive, and it also bothered my wife's neck too. In the forums, people are even replacing them with headrests from 2006 Accords.
So, it could be worse! The TCH headrest is still a bit too forward for me, but ok (from what I remember...I receive my car next week).
#5
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
Re: Headrests
I test drove the Civic Hybrid before deciding on a Camry Hybrid. ... In the forums, people are even replacing them with headrests from 2006 Accords.
So, it could be worse! The TCH headrest is still a bit too forward for me, but ok (from what I remember...I receive my car next week).
I test drove the Civic Hybrid before deciding on a Camry Hybrid. ... In the forums, people are even replacing them with headrests from 2006 Accords.
So, it could be worse! The TCH headrest is still a bit too forward for me, but ok (from what I remember...I receive my car next week).
#7
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
Yes, they're moved forward and because of that are uncomfortable like hell. I can not imagine them being moved forward anymore because I would not be able to sit in the car at all. Even those headrest I have now make me move my head to the side and lean it against the side window which is not really a good idea in case of side crash, which would deploy side curtains straight into my head. Maybe because I'm 6'3, but if I find another headrest that fits and it's more reclined to the rear I will replace it in a jiffy. I really have no idea why rear crash test would show the headrest as being less than ideal, are they assuming the driver will be hugging the steering wheel and be far away from the seat? I also wish I could find side folding mirrors. The way it is now, if something hits the mirror, the whole door will be damaged and probably would need replacement, easily avoided in a lot of cases with folding mirror. Saved my previous car from damage more than once. But that's about all the complains I have about the car and hopefully will find solutions to make it perfect soon.
#8
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
Suggestion one: Take it out and turn it around. This may be just about right for you. I guess you are increasing your whiplash potential if you do.
Suggestion two: I as wondering if the metal poles could be bent in a vise, or maybe via a rubber mallet. If they were straighten-up a bit, then you might be ok.
Suggestion two: I as wondering if the metal poles could be bent in a vise, or maybe via a rubber mallet. If they were straighten-up a bit, then you might be ok.
#9
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
I think they find the headrests less than ideal because they are not sculptured to cradle your head like those in some Volvos I've seen.
I'm 6'3" tall - 200-210 (after Thanksgiving) 34" inseam and I fit just fine and am comfortable with the headrests.
I'm also comfortable with the crash rating of the Toyota Camry and am curious how they would rate the Hybrid version.
I'm 6'3" tall - 200-210 (after Thanksgiving) 34" inseam and I fit just fine and am comfortable with the headrests.
I'm also comfortable with the crash rating of the Toyota Camry and am curious how they would rate the Hybrid version.
#10
Re: Camry rated marginal on rear accident protection
I think they find the headrests less than ideal because they are not sculptured to cradle your head like those in some Volvos I've seen.
I'm 6'3" tall - 200-210 (after Thanksgiving) 34" inseam and I fit just fine and am comfortable with the headrests.
I'm also comfortable with the crash rating of the Toyota Camry and am curious how they would rate the Hybrid version.
I'm 6'3" tall - 200-210 (after Thanksgiving) 34" inseam and I fit just fine and am comfortable with the headrests.
I'm also comfortable with the crash rating of the Toyota Camry and am curious how they would rate the Hybrid version.