Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
#11
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
Originally Posted by cleverlever
Let me present this from a different perspective. Do you think the megabuck high performance hybrids should be entitled to taxpayer subsidy?
Should the purchase of gas-guzzling SUVs, which won't come close to being as clean as the GS450h, be entitled to taxpayer subsidy?
Rick
#12
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
Originally Posted by cleverlever
So then the next move is a hybrid Hummer?
#13
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
cleverlever wrote:
It will be nice to have some choices in the 140-200hp range.
cleverlever wrote:
Are you guys noticing a trend?
Even your favorite hybrid company is focusing on marketing hybrid technology as a PERFORMNCE OPTION rather than a means to increase fuel economy.
Nothing wrong with selling performance AND fuel efficiency if it sells cars to people that would otherwise buy a non-hybrid. I think the upcoming Camry Hybrid will strike a good balance between horsepower and fuel economy.Even your favorite hybrid company is focusing on marketing hybrid technology as a PERFORMNCE OPTION rather than a means to increase fuel economy.
It will be nice to have some choices in the 140-200hp range.
cleverlever wrote:
Let me present this from a different perspective. Do you think the megabuck high performance hybrids should be entitled to taxpayer subsidy?
The Tax Credit is propotional to the gas savings so a performance hybrid gets a lower subsidy, I don't have a problem with that.
#14
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
Are you guys noticing a trend?
Even your favorite hybrid company is focusing on marketing hybrid technology as a PERFORMNCE OPTION rather than a means to increase fuel economy.
Even your favorite hybrid company is focusing on marketing hybrid technology as a PERFORMNCE OPTION rather than a means to increase fuel economy.
This is one of the inconsistencies I see with the Accord Hybrid comparisons, which say it doesn't save much gas compared to the Accord I4, when it would be more accurately compared to an Accord V6 with some sort of performance mod on it. Also, a lot of the reason why the auto makers are emphasizing performance is a response to the image problem that hybrids are all underpowered economy vehicles, for the most part peopel are aware of the fuel economy aspect of the hybrids already so there's not as much reason to advertise it.
Should the purchase of gas-guzzling SUVs, which won't come close to being as clean as the GS450h, be entitled to taxpayer subsidy?
#15
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
Originally Posted by Double-Trinity
As far as I know, cars must achieve 45mpg on the EPA cycle to qualify for benefits in most states. As far as the Federal credit, that I believe is there to supplement the technology on the basis of how much the hybrid saves fuel over a comparable non-hybrid, so to be consistent, it should also receive the credit to the extent the technology saves fuel.
What ender21 was referring to was a ridiculous tax break for gas-guzzling SUVs, *not* hybrids, for businesses. Basically the worst gas-guzzlers, if used only for commercial purposes, can be subsidized, but more fuel-efficient cars cannot.
#16
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
The GS450h is also more efficient in FE than it's ICE sibling, the GS430. Maybe it's the 430 that should be de-emphasized.
#17
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
Originally Posted by cleverlever
Let me present this from a different perspective. Do you think the megabuck high performance hybrids should be entitled to taxpayer subsidy?
#18
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
They want the power, pure and simple. Any collateral benefit to mileage comes along for the ride, but it's a happy coincidence. Battery-powered turbo-charger is the first and only reason to hybrid a vehicle like that. Anyone buying a $60,000 car can pay for gas and probably does not care about mileage.
They get points for continuing to advance and expand the technology, but not much else.
They get points for continuing to advance and expand the technology, but not much else.
#19
Yes, This is Far-Fetched
I think most people would think having hybrid ambulances and fire trucks a good idea once it becomes practicle (some time in the future). To do that, there needs to be more buses and big cars that use this technology.
If a few people get a 60K luxury car because it's hybrid instead of a jumbo SUV or something else that uses more gas, it's still a positive. Status and peer pressure motivates these buyers, so hopefully green becomes cool.
If a few people get a 60K luxury car because it's hybrid instead of a jumbo SUV or something else that uses more gas, it's still a positive. Status and peer pressure motivates these buyers, so hopefully green becomes cool.
#20
Re: Toyota's New Expensive Hybrid
Originally Posted by Tim
They want the power, pure and simple. Any collateral benefit to mileage comes along for the ride, but it's a happy coincidence. Battery-powered turbo-charger is the first and only reason to hybrid a vehicle like that. Anyone buying a $60,000 car can pay for gas and probably does not care about mileage.
They get points for continuing to advance and expand the technology, but not much else.
They get points for continuing to advance and expand the technology, but not much else.