GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
#11
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
I'm not going to explain all of this, but the purpose of the GM transmission is so that it can deal with heavy loads. If this is the system I'm thinking of, it has a set of planetary gears that allow the electric motor(s) to add torque.
Here's a link. I think there was even more detailed info on someone elses site:
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/04/...hybrid-system/
If GM were to try for EV only, there are really only two ways of doing it AFAIK... ridiculous gearing, or a huge motor and electrical system capable of delivering very high current all the way through.
I still think the EV only mode advantage is very slight, but at this point it warrants its own discussion elsewhere.
Here's a link. I think there was even more detailed info on someone elses site:
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/04/...hybrid-system/
If GM were to try for EV only, there are really only two ways of doing it AFAIK... ridiculous gearing, or a huge motor and electrical system capable of delivering very high current all the way through.
I still think the EV only mode advantage is very slight, but at this point it warrants its own discussion elsewhere.
#12
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Originally Posted by Mr. Kite
. . . My HCHII does not have a legitimate EV-mode, but I do quite well. . . .
1) BAS hybrids - saving idling fuel; smallest E-hp/G-hp and wheel-hp = G-hp
2) IMA hybrids - expanded engine operational modes and electric power assist; medium E-hp/G-hp and wheel-hp = E-hp+G-hp
3) EV hybrids - limited EV mode, typically 30 mph or less; higher E-hp/G-hp and either wheel-hp = E-hp or wheel-hp = E-hp+G-hp
Changes in the control laws for a "BAS hybrid" would make it function almost like an IMA using a belt instead of a direct mechanical link. Then if you took a second BAS motor and battery pack and connected it to a retractable 5th wheel, you'd have an "EV hybrid." Sounds like fun.
Bob Wilson
#13
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Originally Posted by Mr. Kite
Just because having the EV-mode is fun does not mean that it is necessary to make a significant improvement on fuel economy or emissions. My HCHII does not have a legitimate EV-mode, but I do quite well. I could care less if somebody wants to say that my car is not a legitimate hybrid. I could have paid a lot more money for a Prius with its EV-mode.
#14
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Originally Posted by blinkard
I would've preferred that Honda had designed the HCH2's EV-only mode to be 0-5mph, say. I don't need to cruise in EV mode, but I'd love to be able to creep forward in stop-and-go traffic without the ICE powering up. Isn't 13hp enough to move a small car that much?
Last edited by Mr. Kite; 08-03-2006 at 12:57 PM.
#15
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Originally Posted by blinkard
I would've preferred that Honda had designed the HCH2's EV-only mode to be 0-5mph, say. I don't need to cruise in EV mode, but I'd love to be able to creep forward in stop-and-go traffic without the ICE powering up. Isn't 13hp enough to move a small car that much?
Heck, at 13-20 hp, there should be enough 'creep' power even if you have to turn the ICE. With some sort of compression relief, it would work. Then there is the 5th wheel approach.
It might be more practical to rig up a 5th wheel that comes down when slow-speed EV mode is needed. This is not a trivial problem but it may be easier than hacking into the HCH control systems. But the HCH is not a system I have a lot of information about.
NOTE: the rear wheels of the HCH are unpowered and I suspect there is a suspension beam between the two. One easy hack would be to put an electronic only, rear-wheel axle/differential in place. There would need to be some shifting around but it would solve the problem without having to hack the existing IMA design.
Bob Wilson
Last edited by bwilson4web; 08-04-2006 at 09:42 AM.
#16
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Originally Posted by Orcrone
I personally don't care how they get there, whether or not EV mode is possible, whether they have one or two transmissions. Regardless of the implementation a 25% increase in fuel economy is nothing to sneeze at.
And as was said earlier, people will still be looking for big powerful trucks, regardless of whether they need them (construction industry) or whether they want them (1 kid and 2 bags of groceries). In some circumstances this may not be the most efficient vehicle for the consumer's needs, but at least it's a lot more efficient than what they would have purchased.
And as was said earlier, people will still be looking for big powerful trucks, regardless of whether they need them (construction industry) or whether they want them (1 kid and 2 bags of groceries). In some circumstances this may not be the most efficient vehicle for the consumer's needs, but at least it's a lot more efficient than what they would have purchased.
Originally Posted by Nagorak
It seems weird to me that they're including two transmissions, CVT and conventional automatic. What exactly are the advantages of an automatic tranny over a CVT?
Peace,
Martin
#17
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Originally Posted by Nagorak
It seems weird to me that they're including two transmissions, CVT and conventional automatic. What exactly are the advantages of an automatic tranny over a CVT? I thought the whole point of a CVT was it could keep the engine constantly close to max efficiency?
Having two transmissions sounds like a lot of unnecessary complexity-- just another thing that could potentially break down.
I am still also wondering whether the market really is there for these sorts of large hybrids. But, this is GM, you can count on them to run large trucks into the ground before actually trying to make smaller cars.
Having two transmissions sounds like a lot of unnecessary complexity-- just another thing that could potentially break down.
I am still also wondering whether the market really is there for these sorts of large hybrids. But, this is GM, you can count on them to run large trucks into the ground before actually trying to make smaller cars.
#18
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
All the energy from a non-plugin hybrid comes from the tank of gas - the electric component just recovers wasted kinetic energy. EV mode would be critical - if not essential to a plugin hybrid.
Last edited by Delta Flyer; 08-03-2006 at 09:02 PM.
#19
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
There is a market, right here in Lakedude land. My truck is getting up there in age and I will eventually need a new boat hauler. The Escape Hybrid would be perfect except that it cannot pull a full size boat. None of the current hybrids (or any truck for that matter) meet my needs (the other hybrid SUVs are out of my price range). There is no reason a truck or SUV couldn't get mid twenties to high thirties and still get the boat to the lake.
I'm looking forward to the dual mode tranny and also the upcoming mid sized diesels.
I'm looking forward to the dual mode tranny and also the upcoming mid sized diesels.
#20
Re: GM To Debut Hybrid Full-Sized Trucks in Fall '07
Delta, I agree that without EV only mode, plugin doesn't make as much sense... especially for city driving.
In terms of global warming, I think plugins can vary anywhere between a win or a slight loss. Allow me to explain:
I found two companies that are producing are about ready to produce an add-on to make the Prius pluggable. One says that with a 9KW charge, you can go 30 miles. Another says they have a 9kwh battery, but you can only use 6.4kwh for EV only mode, then you get battery, but again, 30 miles.
So I'll assume 6.4kwh = 30 miles. If you travel 46.7 miles at this rate of consumption, you will emit the same amount of CO2 as burning a gallon of gas, if your power grid is exclusively coal.
On one hand, 46.7mpg in terms of Co2 emissions still isn't bad, and I doubt most people are exclusively using electricity derived from non-co2 recapturing coal plants. On the other hand though, this assumes you kept the Prius in EV mode, which is unsuitable for highway traffic, and presumably for much of metro area traffic. Once you beef up the system to deliver more juice to a bigger electric motor, you become less efficient (fighting aerodynamics). Oh, and you're production cost (which is energy usage, which is CO2 emissions) goes up too.
So if you have a nuclear power grid, a plugin would be a slam dunk. If your power grid is primarily coal and you're driving a plugable or EV that travels at 60MPH+ in EV mode, it's not really progress in terms of global warming.
In either case, it appears to be a step in the right direction for decreasing our reliance on foreign oil. But still, it is only part of the puzzle. The power grid has to be cleaned up and eventually made renewable if plugins or EVs are going to be a legit permanent solution.
In terms of global warming, I think plugins can vary anywhere between a win or a slight loss. Allow me to explain:
I found two companies that are producing are about ready to produce an add-on to make the Prius pluggable. One says that with a 9KW charge, you can go 30 miles. Another says they have a 9kwh battery, but you can only use 6.4kwh for EV only mode, then you get battery, but again, 30 miles.
So I'll assume 6.4kwh = 30 miles. If you travel 46.7 miles at this rate of consumption, you will emit the same amount of CO2 as burning a gallon of gas, if your power grid is exclusively coal.
On one hand, 46.7mpg in terms of Co2 emissions still isn't bad, and I doubt most people are exclusively using electricity derived from non-co2 recapturing coal plants. On the other hand though, this assumes you kept the Prius in EV mode, which is unsuitable for highway traffic, and presumably for much of metro area traffic. Once you beef up the system to deliver more juice to a bigger electric motor, you become less efficient (fighting aerodynamics). Oh, and you're production cost (which is energy usage, which is CO2 emissions) goes up too.
So if you have a nuclear power grid, a plugin would be a slam dunk. If your power grid is primarily coal and you're driving a plugable or EV that travels at 60MPH+ in EV mode, it's not really progress in terms of global warming.
In either case, it appears to be a step in the right direction for decreasing our reliance on foreign oil. But still, it is only part of the puzzle. The power grid has to be cleaned up and eventually made renewable if plugins or EVs are going to be a legit permanent solution.