US govt proposes rules for hybrid cars
#1
05-31-2007, 04:12 PM
US govt proposes rules for hybrid cars
The Environmental Protection Agency proposed new criteria for certifying vehicles as clean and energy efficient for states that let hybrid drivers use the special lanes for avoiding rush-hour traffic.
Hybrid vehicles would need to achieve 25 percent higher combined fuel efficiency compared to similar gasoline-fueled vehicles to qualify for high occupancy vehicle lanes, or HOV lanes, allowing only the driver.
Only four manufacturers - Toyota Motor Corp., Honda Motor Co., Ford Motor Co. and Mazda Motor Corp. - produce vehicles that would qualify under the plan. A limited number of natural gas vehicles built by Honda and Ford would also meet the standards.
Hybrid vehicles would need to achieve 25 percent higher combined fuel efficiency compared to similar gasoline-fueled vehicles to qualify for high occupancy vehicle lanes, or HOV lanes, allowing only the driver.
Only four manufacturers - Toyota Motor Corp., Honda Motor Co., Ford Motor Co. and Mazda Motor Corp. - produce vehicles that would qualify under the plan. A limited number of natural gas vehicles built by Honda and Ford would also meet the standards.
#2
06-01-2007, 09:45 AM
Re: US govt proposes rules for hybrid cars
What's confusing about this is that at least some (most?) states require special registration for the car. In the case of California the number of vehicles they would allow was limited (hence the media hype over used hybrids going for $4000 more IF they had the HOV 'OK' sticker.)
With all the FUD about why Hybrids aren't *really* practical, the CNV paper, etc. consumers are getting mixed messages about whether the hybrids are financially affordable by anyone other than the wealthy, whether or not they actually pay off in savings at the pump, or whether or not they really help the environment -- much less the US governments mixed message about global warming and if it's really a problem. <sigh>
Seems to me that states which are really serious about emissions and fuel consumption would just grant hybrids unlimited access to HOV lanes (either no registration required *or* no limit on the number of qualifying hybrids that can register). This makes sense since motorcycles generally don't even need to register and the Prius actually gets better average fuel economy than a lot of motorcyles!
If consumers are willing to pay $4000 for a used hybrid with a sticker, it sounds like this is an easy way to get consumers to do the right thing without imposing burdens on anyone (e.g. car companies belly-aching about the 35mpg CAFE proposal).
The need to register, caps, government tax credits which huge numbers of consumers ended up either not getting at all or only being allowed to claim a partial credit all create confusion and frustration which will slow the adoption. I've learned years ago... people will basically do the easy thing. If it's complicated then they wont bother with it. Qualifying for benefits of hybrid (or any other low-emission/zero emission vehicle) shouldn't be complicated.
With all the FUD about why Hybrids aren't *really* practical, the CNV paper, etc. consumers are getting mixed messages about whether the hybrids are financially affordable by anyone other than the wealthy, whether or not they actually pay off in savings at the pump, or whether or not they really help the environment -- much less the US governments mixed message about global warming and if it's really a problem. <sigh>
Seems to me that states which are really serious about emissions and fuel consumption would just grant hybrids unlimited access to HOV lanes (either no registration required *or* no limit on the number of qualifying hybrids that can register). This makes sense since motorcycles generally don't even need to register and the Prius actually gets better average fuel economy than a lot of motorcyles!
If consumers are willing to pay $4000 for a used hybrid with a sticker, it sounds like this is an easy way to get consumers to do the right thing without imposing burdens on anyone (e.g. car companies belly-aching about the 35mpg CAFE proposal).
The need to register, caps, government tax credits which huge numbers of consumers ended up either not getting at all or only being allowed to claim a partial credit all create confusion and frustration which will slow the adoption. I've learned years ago... people will basically do the easy thing. If it's complicated then they wont bother with it. Qualifying for benefits of hybrid (or any other low-emission/zero emission vehicle) shouldn't be complicated.
#3
06-01-2007, 11:45 AM
Re: US govt proposes rules for hybrid cars
Excellent! I had wondered about the 'light weight' hybrids getting stickers. I thought the States handled this but nice to know the Federals are also aware.
Bob Wilson
Bob Wilson
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Curated Content Editor
Journalism & The Media
0
06-02-2014 01:00 PM
Curated Content Editor
Journalism & The Media
0
03-29-2013 11:20 AM
Jason
Hybrid & Related News
0
06-17-2005 08:48 AM
lars-ss
Fuel Economy & Emissions
1
04-27-2005 12:06 PM
