Truth or Consequences
Thread Starter
|
Site Founder
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,623
Truth or Consequences
Imagine for a minute, just a minute, that someone running for president was able to actually tell the truth, the real truth, to the American people about what would be the best — I mean really the best — energy policy for the long-term economic health and security of our country. I realize this is a fantasy, but play along with me for a minute. What would this mythical, totally imaginary, truth-telling candidate say?
Pretty Darn Active Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 264
From: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Truth or Consequences
Thing that Friedman gets massively wrong in this article is that there was a candidate who told the truth to the American people once, even when they didn't want to hear it or listen. His name was Jimmy Carter, and if people would've listened to him back then, we wouldn't be heading for the precipice we're heading toward now.
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
Re: Truth or Consequences
A completely honest politician would say the country must break with its past of oil dependance. No one technology holds the key; rather multiple technologies will play a part. Electricity would be generated by modern, clean burning coal power plants as well as nuclear and natural gas-fired plants. Solar, wind & sea turbines will play a part as non-polluting renewable energy sources. Automotive hybrid technology, both gas and diesel will reduce the demand for motor fuels. Clean diesels would be able to burn biofuels, and gov't subsidized ethanol would fade into history.
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
