Consumer Reports reviewed the 2006 HCH

Old Jan 6, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #11  
xcel's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,567
From: Northern Illinois
Default Re: Consumer Reports reviewed the 2006 HCH

--
 

Last edited by xcel; Dec 2, 2007 at 06:58 PM.
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 05:55 PM
  #12  
jlambeth's Avatar
Razorx
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 57
From: Redlands, CA
Default Re: Consumer Reports reviewed the 2006 HCH

Originally Posted by CGameProgrammer
But that's much different because every single FE result achieved in the car is 100% "correct". But it can yield vastly different FEs depending on how it's driven. The issue here was whether or not CR drives their cars in a consistent manner, and it seems like they do since the FEs of two cars, which should get similar mileage, actually did. It's not an issue of being consistent with expectations, it's an issue of being consistent. You're using a different definition of the word 'consistent'.
The term "should" should not be used. They are different vehicles with different engines/IMAs. It is reasonable to expect similar results but "should" is a judgement call before the test has occurred. Pre-judgements are to be avoided since results are often skewed from such either directly or more often indirectly.

Achieving results that are similar does not prove consistency in how the test was executed. For example(assume): HCH I was tested on a 50 degree day, HCH II was tested on a 80 degree day with different drivers. The driver for the HCH II wore a heavier shoe and tended to apply more gas (ever so slightly). The FEs based on these factors offset each other yielding similar results for both vehicles however, it is not a sign of consistent testing methodology.

Originally Posted by CGameProgrammer
Uh, no. At best it is actual genuine consistency. At worst it is a fluke or a lie. I do not think CR lies, do you? And I think it's odd to attribute realistic results to mere coincidence ("a fluke"), in this situation.
It is not a question of CR lying, it is an issue of reviewing their testing methodology and determining the rigor used to insure consistency. I would expect that they are very careful, but since I have not seen their methodology, I do not assume "consistency" from results. Statistics without a full understanding of the assumptions are of no value. Actually, when a full understanding occurs around the assumptions used to derive statistics, most statistics end up being relatively meaningless. It makes something for the news to talk about though and also justifies grants...

Originally Posted by CGameProgrammer
What? That makes no sense! The ratio of city/highway driving is entirely up to the driver, not the car.
Not referring to "driving" but the mpg ratios in accordance with their testing. For example: 47/26 as H/C and comparing that ratio to HCH II. "Driving" I assume you to mean in miles.

Originally Posted by CGameProgrammer
The first statement is inaccurate but not incorrect. CR did get 47 mpg driving probably 60-65 mph on the highway, as do many people here. But of course that doesn't mean everyone will.
For CR it was accurate, an assertion that it is applicable to someone else is not.

Originally Posted by CGameProgrammer
The second statement is, of course, perfectly accurate.
Mais oui!

As a side note, it is strange letting cars pass me driving the hybrid while I am trying to work on my FE. No cars pass me in my S2000 unless a lane is backed up.

Driving in the right lanes most of the time! THAT is most weird as well.
 
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #13  
azwildbill2's Avatar
Active Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 110
From: Phoenix, AZ USA
Default Re: Consumer Reports reviewed the 2006 HCH

I'm not sure of CRs testing measures, but when I test drove my first HCH, I was getting excellent mileage even before I learned some of the techniques here. I'm still amazed at the low numbers some of the different magazines get when they test drive them.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cwerdna
Honda Motor Company/Acura
0
Feb 27, 2014 12:05 AM
test54
Hydrogen Vehicles
3
Jun 3, 2009 04:04 PM
Galileo
HCH II-Specific Discussions
5
Apr 17, 2007 09:57 AM
tigerhonaker
Journalism & The Media
0
Jan 14, 2006 01:00 PM
tigerhonaker
Journalism & The Media
0
Jan 9, 2006 05:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us -

  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 AM.