Taken for a nasty ride!
#11
Audi mid 80's-many reports-why we have lock on trans if brake not depressed
Interesting.
In the mid 80's there were many reports of this very thing happening with Audis. It is the reason we now have to press on the brake pedal , or you can't put it in drive or reverse(from park).
I think the final results of the Audi deal weren't conclusive-no smoking gun was found.
The weight of opinion from "experts" was that most of these accidents were caused by folks accidently hitting the gas when they meant to hit the brake.
Car are much more automated now, and more things are drive by wire.The driver has less direct control. However, I think that the brakes are still mainly under the drivers control. I could see gently brake pressure being over ridden by the "computer" telling the car to just apply regen brakes, and not the actual hydraulic brakes.
I just don't know if it is possible for a heavy braking imput to be over ridden by the cars automatic controls. I think the "real" disc brakes will be engaged-I don't think there is a way to over ride-or pop off like a turbo valve- the hydraulic pressure.
Does anyone know this?Any car engineers out there? It would seem to be very dangerous to "fool with" the actual disc brakes-to drop the pressure in the line to allow more regen braking. There would be too much potential for accidents.
Alina,I'm just parroting the common wisdom, not taking a swipe at you. The common wisdom can be wrong- your car might have a flaw..
Good luck,keep us up to date on this,
Charlie
In the mid 80's there were many reports of this very thing happening with Audis. It is the reason we now have to press on the brake pedal , or you can't put it in drive or reverse(from park).
I think the final results of the Audi deal weren't conclusive-no smoking gun was found.
The weight of opinion from "experts" was that most of these accidents were caused by folks accidently hitting the gas when they meant to hit the brake.
Car are much more automated now, and more things are drive by wire.The driver has less direct control. However, I think that the brakes are still mainly under the drivers control. I could see gently brake pressure being over ridden by the "computer" telling the car to just apply regen brakes, and not the actual hydraulic brakes.
I just don't know if it is possible for a heavy braking imput to be over ridden by the cars automatic controls. I think the "real" disc brakes will be engaged-I don't think there is a way to over ride-or pop off like a turbo valve- the hydraulic pressure.
Does anyone know this?Any car engineers out there? It would seem to be very dangerous to "fool with" the actual disc brakes-to drop the pressure in the line to allow more regen braking. There would be too much potential for accidents.
Alina,I'm just parroting the common wisdom, not taking a swipe at you. The common wisdom can be wrong- your car might have a flaw..
Good luck,keep us up to date on this,
Charlie
#12
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
When I asked if you were pressing the accelerator, I meant as other have described. Brake and Accelerator, something is going to give, especially on a front wheel drive car (and especially if it's an automatic).
Also, you are coming across the wrong way because you are upset with a dealer that took advantage of you in your negotiations, sounds like you should have walked away from the deal.
Also, you are coming across the wrong way because you are upset with a dealer that took advantage of you in your negotiations, sounds like you should have walked away from the deal.
Regarding the dealer...
I leased the car and walked out a happy camper. Two weeks later, the dealer called me to say I had made too large of a down payment, so they needed to refund some of my money. I happened to be home sick that day and thought I'd go pick up the refund since it seemed like a quick and easy task. When I got there, they said that yes, they were giving me some money back AND that my monthly payments would double. I took issue with that, so they offered to sell me the car instead, which would be slightly lower payments but still considerably higher than the original contract. My head was fuzzy. I should have walked out and consulted a lawyer first. I went ahead and allowed them to change the contract. They then proceeded to totally mess up all the paper work, so that the registration was incorrect and the DMV was threatening me. It was something the dealer had to clear up and it took them MONTHS.
They also entered the wrong address for my billing, so my first bill arrived late and they called me with nasty messages (I had called them a week before trying to locate the bill).
These were all errors on the dealer's part. Not mine.
I feel like you think I'm an idiot.
#13
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
I have actually been wondering about this. On a front drive car, if you have the brake pedal pressed down hard then how far do you have to depress the accelerator to get the car to move?
Will it move at all?
The brakes can bring the car from 60-0 a lot faster and in less distance than the engine can take it from 0-60. I suspect that the HAH generates enough torque at the wheels to overcome maximum brake application, but not enough to allow the car to accelerate rapidly even at peak engine torque.
Anybody know if the engine control module stores data that would allow things like throttle and brake position at the time of the accident to be determined. I know that if there's a fault code set the computer stores the information from all its sensors at that time. My question is, does it keep more than current data in memory or does it have several seconds or minutes of data that can be read.
Will it move at all?
The brakes can bring the car from 60-0 a lot faster and in less distance than the engine can take it from 0-60. I suspect that the HAH generates enough torque at the wheels to overcome maximum brake application, but not enough to allow the car to accelerate rapidly even at peak engine torque.
Anybody know if the engine control module stores data that would allow things like throttle and brake position at the time of the accident to be determined. I know that if there's a fault code set the computer stores the information from all its sensors at that time. My question is, does it keep more than current data in memory or does it have several seconds or minutes of data that can be read.
I sure hope there's a "blackbox" or stored data about what the car did. I want to know.
#14
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
Yes, education does cost money, and yes I learned something.
#15
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
I have actually been wondering about this. On a front drive car, if you have the brake pedal pressed down hard then how far do you have to depress the accelerator to get the car to move?
Will it move at all?
The brakes can bring the car from 60-0 a lot faster and in less distance than the engine can take it from 0-60. I suspect that the HAH generates enough torque at the wheels to overcome maximum brake application, but not enough to allow the car to accelerate rapidly even at peak engine torque.
Anybody know if the engine control module stores data that would allow things like throttle and brake position at the time of the accident to be determined. I know that if there's a fault code set the computer stores the information from all its sensors at that time. My question is, does it keep more than current data in memory or does it have several seconds or minutes of data that can be read.
Will it move at all?
The brakes can bring the car from 60-0 a lot faster and in less distance than the engine can take it from 0-60. I suspect that the HAH generates enough torque at the wheels to overcome maximum brake application, but not enough to allow the car to accelerate rapidly even at peak engine torque.
Anybody know if the engine control module stores data that would allow things like throttle and brake position at the time of the accident to be determined. I know that if there's a fault code set the computer stores the information from all its sensors at that time. My question is, does it keep more than current data in memory or does it have several seconds or minutes of data that can be read.
In a rwd car, depending on the surface, you can over power your brakes.
In an awd car, you can over power your brakes on any surface.
All cases are with an automatic tranny. Too hard to do in a standard.
#16
Re: Audi mid 80's-many reports-why we have lock on trans if brake not depressed
Interesting.
In the mid 80's there were many reports of this very thing happening with Audis. It is the reason we now have to press on the brake pedal , or you can't put it in drive or reverse(from park).
I think the final results of the Audi deal weren't conclusive-no smoking gun was found.
The weight of opinion from "experts" was that most of these accidents were caused by folks accidently hitting the gas when they meant to hit the brake.
Car are much more automated now, and more things are drive by wire.The driver has less direct control. However, I think that the brakes are still mainly under the drivers control. I could see gently brake pressure being over ridden by the "computer" telling the car to just apply regen brakes, and not the actual hydraulic brakes.
I just don't know if it is possible for a heavy braking imput to be over ridden by the cars automatic controls. I think the "real" disc brakes will be engaged-I don't think there is a way to over ride-or pop off like a turbo valve- the hydraulic pressure.
Does anyone know this?Any car engineers out there? It would seem to be very dangerous to "fool with" the actual disc brakes-to drop the pressure in the line to allow more regen braking. There would be too much potential for accidents.
Alina,I'm just parroting the common wisdom, not taking a swipe at you. The common wisdom can be wrong- your car might have a flaw..
Good luck,keep us up to date on this,
Charlie
In the mid 80's there were many reports of this very thing happening with Audis. It is the reason we now have to press on the brake pedal , or you can't put it in drive or reverse(from park).
I think the final results of the Audi deal weren't conclusive-no smoking gun was found.
The weight of opinion from "experts" was that most of these accidents were caused by folks accidently hitting the gas when they meant to hit the brake.
Car are much more automated now, and more things are drive by wire.The driver has less direct control. However, I think that the brakes are still mainly under the drivers control. I could see gently brake pressure being over ridden by the "computer" telling the car to just apply regen brakes, and not the actual hydraulic brakes.
I just don't know if it is possible for a heavy braking imput to be over ridden by the cars automatic controls. I think the "real" disc brakes will be engaged-I don't think there is a way to over ride-or pop off like a turbo valve- the hydraulic pressure.
Does anyone know this?Any car engineers out there? It would seem to be very dangerous to "fool with" the actual disc brakes-to drop the pressure in the line to allow more regen braking. There would be too much potential for accidents.
Alina,I'm just parroting the common wisdom, not taking a swipe at you. The common wisdom can be wrong- your car might have a flaw..
Good luck,keep us up to date on this,
Charlie
I really appreciate your post Charlie. I'm so tired of being beaten down, and not having anyone stop and consider all sides.
#17
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
I am sorry I am coming off the wrong way.
Regarding the dealer...
I leased the car and walked out a happy camper. Two weeks later, the dealer called me to say I had made too large of a down payment, so they needed to refund some of my money. I happened to be home sick that day and thought I'd go pick up the refund since it seemed like a quick and easy task. When I got there, they said that yes, they were giving me some money back AND that my monthly payments would double. I took issue with that, so they offered to sell me the car instead, which would be slightly lower payments but still considerably higher than the original contract. My head was fuzzy. I should have walked out and consulted a lawyer first. I went ahead and allowed them to change the contract. They then proceeded to totally mess up all the paper work, so that the registration was incorrect and the DMV was threatening me. It was something the dealer had to clear up and it took them MONTHS.
They also entered the wrong address for my billing, so my first bill arrived late and they called me with nasty messages (I had called them a week before trying to locate the bill).
These were all errors on the dealer's part. Not mine.
I feel like you think I'm an idiot.
Regarding the dealer...
I leased the car and walked out a happy camper. Two weeks later, the dealer called me to say I had made too large of a down payment, so they needed to refund some of my money. I happened to be home sick that day and thought I'd go pick up the refund since it seemed like a quick and easy task. When I got there, they said that yes, they were giving me some money back AND that my monthly payments would double. I took issue with that, so they offered to sell me the car instead, which would be slightly lower payments but still considerably higher than the original contract. My head was fuzzy. I should have walked out and consulted a lawyer first. I went ahead and allowed them to change the contract. They then proceeded to totally mess up all the paper work, so that the registration was incorrect and the DMV was threatening me. It was something the dealer had to clear up and it took them MONTHS.
They also entered the wrong address for my billing, so my first bill arrived late and they called me with nasty messages (I had called them a week before trying to locate the bill).
These were all errors on the dealer's part. Not mine.
I feel like you think I'm an idiot.
You should create a thread on your dealing with the dealer separate from this. It made me not really take your issue seriously because I figured you had an axe to grind. That's all.
#18
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
You're correct, I should have kept the original dealer situation separate. It really had nothing to do with this, other than this is all costing me a lot of money during the holidays, so it's very frustrating.
#19
Re: Taken for a nasty ride!
It's possible to move forward if you have your emergency brake on, so it seems like the car would be able to move forward. This is a computerized drive-by-wire type of car. The computer could have been doing things that override what I was doing. It's not necessarily mechanical. It could be a software to hardware malfunction.
I sure hope there's a "blackbox" or stored data about what the car did. I want to know.
I sure hope there's a "blackbox" or stored data about what the car did. I want to know.
So, if you had the brake pedal pressed down hard the car would have had to experience simultaneous, unrelated failures of the electronic throttle AND mechanical brake (even if the ABS system fails you still have full braking power) for the car to be able to move forward on its own.
Occam's razor applies. Given the choice of A/ a simultaneous multiple point failure (throttle and brake) or B/ a single point failure (the driver); I have to go with B as being far more likely.
I'm not saying that A/ couldn't happen, it's just not very probable.
#20
Re: Audi mid 80's-many reports-why we have lock on trans if brake not depressed
I would bet that the number of these events that occurs with manual transmission vehicles is also miniscule if not nil.