No More Accord Hybrid !!!!
We looked at the Accord Hybrid before we bought our HCH2, but I really didn't like it. We're big guys and could've used the extra space, but 34mpg just wasn't acceptable. Besides, why pay $8K over the 4-cyl. EX to get exactly the same mileage?
No offense intended, but I thought that introducing a negative-noise generator to cancel the 3-cylinder noise was a patch on top of a patch, and a stupid idea. If they'd designed it as a 4-cylinder hybrid with about 45mpg, I would've bought one.
I've never owned a car with more than 140hp, so the 4-cylinder would've been plenty. I just think that Honda totally misjudged their market on this one. I'll be interested to see how many of the "power" hybrids the other companies sell.
Also, let's not forget that the current Accord design is a bit long in the tooth.
HAH: 34mpg, 253hp, $30,990
HA4: 34mpg, 166hp, $22,450 (EX)
HA6: 29mpg, 244hp, $27,300 (EX)
No offense intended, but I thought that introducing a negative-noise generator to cancel the 3-cylinder noise was a patch on top of a patch, and a stupid idea. If they'd designed it as a 4-cylinder hybrid with about 45mpg, I would've bought one.
I've never owned a car with more than 140hp, so the 4-cylinder would've been plenty. I just think that Honda totally misjudged their market on this one. I'll be interested to see how many of the "power" hybrids the other companies sell.
Also, let's not forget that the current Accord design is a bit long in the tooth.
HAH: 34mpg, 253hp, $30,990
HA4: 34mpg, 166hp, $22,450 (EX)
HA6: 29mpg, 244hp, $27,300 (EX)
Originally Posted by gonavy
JEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZ, people. .......
I could question why some feel a need to comment on others' choices, or why they feel a need to use and display all the power at their disposal. What's wrong with NOT showing off? I've got nothing to prove- my Tshirt collection is plenty big already. I know what the car can do, and why does it matter to anyone else?
I could question why some feel a need to comment on others' choices, or why they feel a need to use and display all the power at their disposal. What's wrong with NOT showing off? I've got nothing to prove- my Tshirt collection is plenty big already. I know what the car can do, and why does it matter to anyone else?
Originally Posted by blinkard
We looked at the Accord Hybrid before we bought our HCH2, but I really didn't like it. We're big guys and could've used the extra space, but 34mpg just wasn't acceptable. Besides, why pay $8K over the 4-cyl. EX to get exactly the same mileage?
No offense intended, but I thought that introducing a negative-noise generator to cancel the 3-cylinder noise was a patch on top of a patch, and a stupid idea. If they'd designed it as a 4-cylinder hybrid with about 45mpg, I would've bought one.
I've never owned a car with more than 140hp, so the 4-cylinder would've been plenty. I just think that Honda totally misjudged their market on this one. I'll be interested to see how many of the "power" hybrids the other companies sell.
Also, let's not forget that the current Accord design is a bit long in the tooth.
HAH: 34mpg, 253hp, $30,990
HA4: 34mpg, 166hp, $22,450 (EX)
HA6: 29mpg, 244hp, $27,300 (EX)
No offense intended, but I thought that introducing a negative-noise generator to cancel the 3-cylinder noise was a patch on top of a patch, and a stupid idea. If they'd designed it as a 4-cylinder hybrid with about 45mpg, I would've bought one.
I've never owned a car with more than 140hp, so the 4-cylinder would've been plenty. I just think that Honda totally misjudged their market on this one. I'll be interested to see how many of the "power" hybrids the other companies sell.
Also, let's not forget that the current Accord design is a bit long in the tooth.
HAH: 34mpg, 253hp, $30,990
HA4: 34mpg, 166hp, $22,450 (EX)
HA6: 29mpg, 244hp, $27,300 (EX)
IMO Honda did the best they could and really thought they could hit up the larger family sedan market...but they kinda missed. Horrendous marketing of the HAH (as in almost none) didn't help either. Tons of threads hre bat that around.
I totally understand how many could (and did) decide the HAH wasn't for them.
not very likely, and that doesn't necessarily solve the fit issue. The smallest 6cyl I've seen was the Ford 2.4L in the Countour and Probe.
When the Accord gets its full respin (2008?) there will almost definitely be a 4cyl hybrid, and it might even be the 'preferred' drivetrain. It will probably be a different engine than the existing series, though. Others here are far better versed in the Honda engines than I am.
When the Accord gets its full respin (2008?) there will almost definitely be a 4cyl hybrid, and it might even be the 'preferred' drivetrain. It will probably be a different engine than the existing series, though. Others here are far better versed in the Honda engines than I am.
Originally Posted by AshenGrey
I agree that the two biggest turn-offs for the HAH have been price and the huge v6 engine. Lets face it: the IMA is just dwarfed by the engine. On a HCH, the IMA provides about 25% of the vehicle's propulsion. On a HAH, it's about 7%.
The Accord, while well-engineered and reliable, just doesn't fly as a $33k car. A $25k i4 1.8L HAH would have sold in huge numbers.
The Accord, while well-engineered and reliable, just doesn't fly as a $33k car. A $25k i4 1.8L HAH would have sold in huge numbers.
I think it might be *slightly* short-sighted to think of the Accord as a $33k car alone, until you price out what a comparably-equipped Prius or Camry would cost. There's not a whole lot of difference in the price between a leathered-up fully equipped model of those two, vs. the Accord.
So it becomes a question of - on a dollar-for-dollar compare - would you want the 4cyl Camry (which doesn't seem to be getting glowing reviews overall) or the Accord, for the same $$.
(Oh and I forgot - do people REALLY pay full-retail for an Accord Hybrid? And how many people have to tack on upward "market adjustments" to get a new Prius)
So a new Accord might be more like a $27-28k car, on a good deal.
Originally Posted by nimbus2k
I think it might be *slightly* short-sighted to think of the Accord as a $33k car alone, until you price out what a comparably-equipped Prius or Camry would cost. There's not a whole lot of difference in the price between a leathered-up fully equipped model of those two, vs. the Accord.
Originally Posted by nimbus2k
I wonder how much of the FE savings on the Accord hybrid vs. regular gas engine are due to the extra features of the car: auto top and active management of switching between 3 and 6 cyl. (And maybe the AC system running off the electric system rather than the gas, as long as the hybrid system is charged.)
I think it might be *slightly* short-sighted to think of the Accord as a $33k car alone, until you price out what a comparably-equipped Prius or Camry would cost. There's not a whole lot of difference in the price between a leathered-up fully equipped model of those two, vs. the Accord.
So it becomes a question of - on a dollar-for-dollar compare - would you want the 4cyl Camry (which doesn't seem to be getting glowing reviews overall) or the Accord, for the same $$.
(Oh and I forgot - do people REALLY pay full-retail for an Accord Hybrid? And how many people have to tack on upward "market adjustments" to get a new Prius)
So a new Accord might be more like a $27-28k car, on a good deal.
I think it might be *slightly* short-sighted to think of the Accord as a $33k car alone, until you price out what a comparably-equipped Prius or Camry would cost. There's not a whole lot of difference in the price between a leathered-up fully equipped model of those two, vs. the Accord.
So it becomes a question of - on a dollar-for-dollar compare - would you want the 4cyl Camry (which doesn't seem to be getting glowing reviews overall) or the Accord, for the same $$.
(Oh and I forgot - do people REALLY pay full-retail for an Accord Hybrid? And how many people have to tack on upward "market adjustments" to get a new Prius)
So a new Accord might be more like a $27-28k car, on a good deal.
These are just general numbers (in North Carolina) but the Prius I priced out with leather, satellite, tinted windows (which I wish Honda would do at the dealer!) etc was just a little over $32k
Then I tried it with the Camry hybrid and managed to "spend" $30,200
Makes the 26k for my Accord (27 if you include the HondaCare extended warranty and 3-year-contract on XM) look not so bad afterall!
Then I tried it with the Camry hybrid and managed to "spend" $30,200
Makes the 26k for my Accord (27 if you include the HondaCare extended warranty and 3-year-contract on XM) look not so bad afterall!



