Residual value vs. non-hybrid
#12
Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid
Yesterday's V6 is no where near today's V6 compared to performance and the same goes for the I4. They both share increased performance and MPG in the newer engines.
I don't tap into the performance in my '09 FEH unless it will increase my MPG over stopping and getting started again. Everything is there as far as performance when I need it and I can't say I'll ever need any more.
The newer direct injection and direct injection EcoBoost engines can give you the best of both Worlds. Ford has better performance and better MPG with smaller engines now.
GaryG
#13
Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid
My father's 2009 2.5 6-speed auto is pleanty fast, and I averaged 32.5 MPG driving from Jersey to Cleveland 2 summer's ago.
In the 2,500 miles I've put on my FEH,I don't think I've tach'ed up over 3 grand yet.
#14
Re: Residual value vs. non-hybrid
I bought this Hybrid for one reason, fuel economy. Unless you're towing, there is no reason to get the V6, IMO. (Talking about 2009's and later)
My father's 2009 2.5 6-speed auto is pleanty fast, and I averaged 32.5 MPG driving from Jersey to Cleveland 2 summer's ago.
In the 2,500 miles I've put on my FEH,I don't think I've tach'ed up over 3 grand yet.
My father's 2009 2.5 6-speed auto is pleanty fast, and I averaged 32.5 MPG driving from Jersey to Cleveland 2 summer's ago.
In the 2,500 miles I've put on my FEH,I don't think I've tach'ed up over 3 grand yet.
With the new Ecoboost F-150 getting 28 HWY MPG, i would expect to see vehicles like the Edge start to get in the low 30 MPG range with Ecoboost engines.
I just picked up a used 08 FEH, and intend to keep it until I can find a 2 year old used 2012 FEH...those should be getting a combined 38-40 MPG rating.
Thread
Topic Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hawkGT647
Journalism & The Media
3
07-26-2005 04:24 AM