PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:07 AM
wwest's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 1,678
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

The PTU is only under STRESS when/if the rear clutch is engaged at some level, up to 100%, 50/50 F/R torque distribution. In the FEH that happens automatically, PRE-EMPTIVELY, with no input from the driver.

If the clutch is "open" or mostly so, little or no engine torque is being conveyed to the rear axle so the PTO is "free-wheeling", under no "drive" stress/HEAT.

The FEH system will go into 100% lock under low speed HARD acceleration, in a tight low speed turn, or in a moderate but accelerating turn.....REGARDLESS OF ROADBED CONDITIONS, HIGHLY TRACTIVE OR NO...!!!

Obviously during those periods, however brief, the driveline will be, might be, under SEVERE STRESS......HEAT...!!

In a true 4WD/4X4, excluding off-road use, owners are cautioned to NEVER have/leave the center "lock" engaged except on KNOWN adverse, SLIPPERY, roadbed conditions, and not to leave the system engaged once up and going regardless of roadbed conditions.

My guess is that the PTO becomes, by default, the weak link, since it also serves as a ~3:1 gear reduction/torque multiplier.
 

Last edited by wwest; 06-07-2012 at 09:35 AM.
  #12  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:17 AM
cmobile's Avatar
Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: El Paso, County Colorado
Posts: 27
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Ah yes, I have a much better understanding, thank you.

Gonna research the amp draw of the rear clutch disengagement mechanism (to determine if I need a relay or not), then determine any potential adverse side effects of electrically disengaging it. I have seen the post about pulling the fuse, but the switch idea makes more sense to me, it if is a viable option.
 
  #13  
Old 06-07-2012, 09:43 AM
wwest's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 1,678
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by cmobile
Ah yes, I have a much better understanding, thank you.

Gonna research the amp draw of the rear clutch disengagement mechanism (to determine if I need a relay or not), then determine any potential adverse side effects of electrically disengaging it. I have seen the post about pulling the fuse, but the switch idea makes more sense to me, it if is a viable option.
The FEH F/awd system uses a PWM, Pulse-Width-Modulated, duty-cycle electrical signal to control the rear clutch in a somewhat "linear" fashon. Possibly making it difficult to determine the required highest level current flow. So I would select a switch or relay based on the fuse value.

But please remember that when the F/awd ECU "thinks" it has "locked" the clutch the functionality of the TC and/or stability control might still be compromised. On the other hand it would be expected that simultaneously with the need to activate a "braking" functionality of this class, like actual brake application, the rear clutch signal will be INSTANTLY disabled.
 

Last edited by wwest; 06-07-2012 at 09:51 AM.
  #14  
Old 06-08-2012, 04:07 PM
stevedebi's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 895
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by cmobile
Ah yes, I have a much better understanding, thank you.

Gonna research the amp draw of the rear clutch disengagement mechanism (to determine if I need a relay or not), then determine any potential adverse side effects of electrically disengaging it. I have seen the post about pulling the fuse, but the switch idea makes more sense to me, it if is a viable option.
I seem to recall that disengaging the 4WD causes a fault light on the dash as well.

Personally, I think it is foolish to mess around with any electrical component in an FEH; the CPU is programmed pretty extensively and specifically for the FORD gas/electric design.

Unlike some people who insist on intruding into a forum, I actually own an FEH...
 
  #15  
Old 06-09-2012, 05:50 AM
wptski's Avatar
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,051
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by cmobile
Ah yes, I have a much better understanding, thank you.

Gonna research the amp draw of the rear clutch disengagement mechanism (to determine if I need a relay or not), then determine any potential adverse side effects of electrically disengaging it. I have seen the post about pulling the fuse, but the switch idea makes more sense to me, it if is a viable option.
Either a switch or pulling the fuse will cause your "wrench" icon to come ON and stay ON hiding/masking any other possible problems.

A trickier and harder soloution would be to fool the system into thinking the circuit is still there by "maybe" adding a resistor across the two wires going back to the rearend unit.
 
  #16  
Old 06-09-2012, 10:17 AM
Billyk's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southwestern Pa
Posts: 1,747
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Personally, I think it is foolish to mess around with any electrical component in an FEH; the CPU is programmed pretty extensively and specifically for the FORD gas/electric design.

+1

Someone continues to post incorrect information about your 2006 FEH and we will leave it at that.
 
  #17  
Old 06-09-2012, 01:02 PM
wptski's Avatar
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,051
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by stevedebi
I seem to recall that disengaging the 4WD causes a fault light on the dash as well.

Personally, I think it is foolish to mess around with any electrical component in an FEH; the CPU is programmed pretty extensively and specifically for the FORD gas/electric design.

Unlike some people who insist on intruding into a forum, I actually own an FEH...
There are some aspects of the FEH that aren't unique to it, one being the 4WD system. I don't own a FEH, only a FE.

It was my curiosity of the 4WD system that lead me to this forum. Because of the thread I started here after viewing SG-II pictures posted by Billyk in another, Desert Dog/CarlD changed his original coding for the SG-II showing the correct rear wheel torque.

I myself at first believed it was a On Demand only system which it clearly isn't!
 
  #18  
Old 06-09-2012, 04:28 PM
wwest's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 1,678
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by wptski
There are some aspects of the FEH that aren't unique to it, one being the 4WD system. I don't own a FEH, only a FE.

It was my curiosity of the 4WD system that lead me to this forum. Because of the thread I started here after viewing SG-II pictures posted by Billyk in another, Desert Dog/CarlD changed his original coding for the SG-II showing the correct rear wheel torque.

I myself at first believed it was a On Demand only system which it clearly isn't!
Yes, even Lexus, for the 2010 RX350, adopted the same F/awd system as used in the FEH. First used by Toyota in the Venza. Even the Porsche Cayenne now uses this same system, but for R/awd, and quite obviously an entirely different firmware suite.
 
  #19  
Old 06-09-2012, 04:36 PM
wwest's Avatar
Ridiculously Active Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 1,678
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by wptski
There are some aspects of the FEH that aren't unique to it, one being the 4WD system. I don't own a FEH, only a FE.

It was my curiosity of the 4WD system that lead me to this forum. Because of the thread I started here after viewing SG-II pictures posted by Billyk in another, Desert Dog/CarlD changed his original coding for the SG-II showing the correct rear wheel torque.

The SG-II can only show the "approximate" rear torque % based on available information, mainly PWM dutycycle. Unlike the Acura SH-AWD system the FEH (and most others that use this technique) F/awd clutch control operates open loop, no feedback sensor to indicate the actual coupling position of the clutch.

I myself at first believed it was a On Demand only system which it clearly isn't!
It really is an "on demand" system (well, sorta), automatic F/awd system. The thing is, the factory engineers have pre-determined, based on various conditions, when "demand" might be appropriate and programmed the rear clutch control firmware accordingly.

It could be "wired" to be fully engage constantly on a known slippery surface but then the burden would be on the driver to be extremely diligent in disabling it when otherwise it would become seriously overstressed.
 

Last edited by wwest; 06-09-2012 at 04:42 PM.
  #20  
Old 06-09-2012, 04:45 PM
wptski's Avatar
Imported from Detroit
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,051
Default Re: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it

Originally Posted by wwest
It really is an "on demand" system (well, sorta), automatic F/awd system. The thing is, the factory engineers have pre-determined, based on various conditions, when "demand" might be appropriate and programmed the rear clutch control firmware accordingly.

It could be "wired" to be fully engage constantly on a known slippery surface but then the burden would be on the driver to be extremely diligent in disabling it when otherwise it would become seriously overstressed.
It engages every time one leaves from a dead stop no matter what the road conditions are so it can't be called a On Demand System.
 


Quick Reply: PTU Oil Change at 54K- it needed it


Contact Us -

  • Manage Preferences
  • Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

    © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands


    All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 AM.