Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
With regard to disposing of the engine without tear down... no sweat, I got the concept. Just my old Navy engineering sense talking.
About that overheating of the bearing: this can happen quite fast if all oil was cutoff which can happen with dirt in the oil flow path. You wouldn't see the overheat in the water temps, its a very local thing right at the bearing & the cooling water jacket is distant from the crankshaft bearings. They're cooled by the oil (which apparently was cutoff). But it would be worth taking apart the oil filter, just to have a look see. In my opinion the cause was jiffy lube. Engine design & technology has been hammered out for over a century. These engines just don't fail like that. There was a cause and its very, very likely related to the most recent change in something: e.g. the jiffy lube experience. I do my own oil for a reason. Its not that the average jiffy lube guy isn't trying to do a god job. Its that I don't want to be the guy that has your experience for the one in a thousand bad jiffy lube guys. Oh yeah, their oil meets minimum specs... but I want better oil than that. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by Bill Winney
(Post 233542)
With regard to disposing of the engine without tear down... no sweat, I got the concept. Just my old Navy engineering sense talking.
About that overheating of the bearing: this can happen quite fast if all oil was cutoff which can happen with dirt in the oil flow path. You wouldn't see the overheat in the water temps, its a very local thing right at the bearing & the cooling water jacket is distant from the crankshaft bearings. They're cooled by the oil (which apparently was cutoff). But it would be worth taking apart the oil filter, just to have a look see. In my opinion the cause was jiffy lube. Engine design & technology has been hammered out for over a century. These engines just don't fail like that. There was a cause and its very, very likely related to the most recent change in something: e.g. the jiffy lube experience. I do my own oil for a reason. Its not that the average jiffy lube guy isn't trying to do a god job. Its that I don't want to be the guy that has your experience for the one in a thousand bad jiffy lube guys. Oh yeah, their oil meets minimum specs... but I want better oil than that. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Further news on our 2006 FEH. We have it back from the dealer now, re-engined, and running fine. The only thing is, our mileage seems to have dropped from about 30-32 in the city, to around 20-22MPG. :( I'm wondering if we got an Atkinson cycle engine or an Otto for our replacement. Is there any way to tell from an external inspection?
|
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by William Maness
(Post 233756)
Further news on our 2006 FEH. We have it back from the dealer now, re-engined, and running fine. The only thing is, our mileage seems to have dropped from about 30-32 in the city, to around 20-22MPG. :( I'm wondering if we got an Atkinson cycle engine or an Otto for our replacement. Is there any way to tell from an external inspection?
they put an Atkinson engine in there. That'd be a real kick in the behind if you proved to them that they put the wrong engine in there. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
It's supposed to be the Atkinson engine isn't it?
|
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by William Maness
(Post 233761)
It's supposed to be the Atkinson engine isn't it?
in the dealers parts department. Also an interesting exercise in how much MPG savings you get using the Atkinson engine. This is gonna be REAL PAINFUL for the dealer. They gotta make it right. Swapping out that Otto for an Atkinson is gonna be REALLY EXPENSIVE the cost of the Atkinson has gotta be 3x what the Otto is and he's gonna get it free. Almost easier to just give'em the swap to Otto for free. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by William Maness
(Post 233756)
Further news on our 2006 FEH. We have it back from the dealer now, re-engined, and running fine. The only thing is, our mileage seems to have dropped from about 30-32 in the city, to around 20-22MPG. :( I'm wondering if we got an Atkinson cycle engine or an Otto for our replacement. Is there any way to tell from an external inspection?
Best bet though is to make the dealer confirm by part number what engine went in. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Ford Motor Company has a policy of "only certified Hybrid techs" can work on the hybrid vehicles. If one is going the route of "the parts department" made a serious error, then you need to add the "person(s)" in the service department to this theory. It doesn't make any sense unless you want to go the route of "corrupt dealership".
Can we ask the owner to go thru a month or two of driving (break in?) and reporting back on fuel economy? |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Stevedebie:
"@Bill Winney, I had no warning or indicator lights of any sort. If it had gotten hot, wouldn't I have had something light up?" Of course it has a sensing mechanism for water temps. It just doesn't have the traditional gauge. Wmmaness: the only difference between the Otto & Atkinson cycle engines is the intake camshaft. I wouldn't expect that dramatic a drop in mileage just from the different cam. There is a learning curve for the software in the engine. Track it for awhile and see if it rises. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by Bill Winney
(Post 233770)
Stevedebie:
"@Bill Winney, I had no warning or indicator lights of any sort. If it had gotten hot, wouldn't I have had something light up?" Of course it has a sensing mechanism for water temps. It just doesn't have the traditional gauge. Wmmaness: the only difference between the Otto & Atkinson cycle engines is the intake camshaft. I wouldn't expect that dramatic a drop in mileage just from the different cam. There is a learning curve for the software in the engine. Track it for awhile and see if it rises. GaryG |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by Bill Winney
(Post 233770)
Wmmaness: the only difference between the Otto & Atkinson cycle engines is the intake camshaft. I wouldn't expect that dramatic a drop in mileage just from the different cam. There is a learning curve for the software in the engine. Track it for awhile and see if it rises.
|
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by Bill Winney
(Post 233770)
Stevedebie:
"@Bill Winney, I had no warning or indicator lights of any sort. If it had gotten hot, wouldn't I have had something light up?" Of course it has a sensing mechanism for water temps. It just doesn't have the traditional gauge. Wmmaness: the only difference between the Otto & Atkinson cycle engines is the intake camshaft. I wouldn't expect that dramatic a drop in mileage just from the different cam. There is a learning curve for the software in the engine. Track it for awhile and see if it rises. If anyone has a shop manual that indicates a water sensor, please feel free to step in any time... |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by Bill Winney
(Post 233770)
Of course it has a sensing mechanism for water temps. It just doesn't have the traditional gauge.
Wmmaness: the only difference between the Otto & Atkinson cycle engines is the intake camshaft. I wouldn't expect that dramatic a drop in mileage just from the different cam. There is a learning curve for the software in the engine. Track it for awhile and see if it rises. being buried behind the timing chain at the front of the engine? I've not heard anyone reporting any problem with such a thing. Tradition Otto engines have them and they are always something that goes bad at the worst of times. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
How about looking for evidence of mounting bracketry for either a starter or an alternator? The FEH motor would have neither.
Without looking at an I4 Escape (in person or a shop manual) I wouldn't know where or how they mount. Just know that the FEH doesn't have them |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by MyPart
(Post 233799)
How about looking for evidence of mounting bracketry for either a starter or an alternator? The FEH motor would have neither.
Without looking at an I4 Escape (in person or a shop manual) I wouldn't know where or how they mount. Just know that the FEH doesn't have them what's called a "box engine" or "short block". It comes on a wooden palate. Accessories like alternators and starter motors would not be included. To me it's just such an easy error to make. Somebody told the parts manager to get a Duratech I 4 for an Escape and that's what he/she got. As mentioned here the only difference is the cam. It will be really interesting to see how this all plays out. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by wilcal
(Post 233801)
I think, I think they way it's done is the dealer would buy
what's called a "box engine" or "short block". It comes on a wooden palate. Accessories like alternators and starter motors would not be included. To me it's just such an easy error to make. Somebody told the parts manager to get a Duratech I 4 for an Escape and that's what he/she got. As mentioned here the only difference is the cam. It will be really interesting to see how this all plays out. GaryG |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
After looking at the pictures of that block, I don't think there's any core value other than recycling price for a hunk of aluminium. :(
|
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
WMManess: the way I track fuel is I get the print out receipt from the gas pump & write the odo number on it. Then put this info into a spreadsheet & have the s/s calculate the mpg. Thus I have a long term s/s set of numbers telling me the health of my engine.
Done this for 432,000 miles on my Suburban & 254,000 miles on my Mustang... Gives me a good idea of what's up inside the engine. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Regarding the temperature sensing mechanism issue:
you have entirely missed the point. One of the crankshaft bearings is "far away" from any kind of temp sensing mechanism and just wouldn't give any warning of impending failure. Similarly the failure mechanism is fast and would happen so quickly that any warning would be just recounting history. So even if the warning light came on in the instrument cluster it wouldn't have served any useful purpose since the damage would have been done. Of course my use of "far away" above is in a relative sense. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
Originally Posted by Bill Winney
(Post 233897)
WMManess: the way I track fuel is I get the print out receipt from the gas pump & write the odo number on it. Then put this info into a spreadsheet & have the s/s calculate the mpg. Thus I have a long term s/s set of numbers telling me the health of my engine.
Done this for 432,000 miles on my Suburban & 254,000 miles on my Mustang... Gives me a good idea of what's up inside the engine. |
Re: 2006 Escape Hybrid: Catastrophic Engine failure @ 65,000 miles
none of the computors are covered at any milage even the one that runs the green mode at 500+$ make sure the coolant containers are full at all times there is a special one for the engine(larger one) and one for the computor module in the engine bay left side (passngr)
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands